#ThrowbackThursday – Chelsea Away

Part one of a lookback at visits to this Saturday’s opponents



#ThrowbackThursday – Chelsea Away


It’s often said that Chelsea FC have no history. Stamford Bridge however has a history which pre-dates Arsenal FC. And Chelsea FC for that matter. The Stadium opened in 1877 as an Athletics stadium and the home of the London Athletic Club, who moved there from the Lillie Bridge Grounds which was just a few hundred yards north and the venue for the 1873 FA Cup Final between the Wanderers and Oxford University (where the kick off was rearranged to Midday in order to avoid clashing with the Varsity Boat Race!). In the building of Stamford Bridge, a piece of digging machinery got out of control and pummelled through a nearby house and into a safe just the other side of the wall, meaning that a heck of a lot of coinage found itself buried under Stamford Bridge (something no doubt for Chelsea to dig up, should Abramovich decide to pull out of Stamford Bridge).

In 1896, the lease for the stadium at Stamford Bridge was acquired by Gus Mears and his brother Joseph Theophilus (ironically also known as ‘J.T.’ – yes, seriously!). The Mears brothers were the offspring Joseph Mears – a builder whose company, Mears Builders, is still in existence today. While Stamford Bridge was occupied with Track and Field meetings during the summer months, the Mears Brothers had wanted something to generate revenue at the Stadium during the winter months, with Football being the obvious solution. The Mears brothers however were unable to implement this until they acquired the freehold for Stamford Bridge, which came up in 1904. Chelsea FC are often derided by opposition fans as being a ‘Small club in Fulham’ – statement of which is at the very least geographically correct, as Stamford Bridge is situated off of the Fulham Road and its nearest underground station is in fact Fulham Broadway.

The Mears brothers had approached the existing Fulham Football Club requesting as to whether they would be interested in playing their home games at Stamford Bridge. The chairman of Fulham Football club had been none other than Henry Norris, the mayor of Fulham and subsequently the chairman of Arsenal (as you will see Norris is one of several Arsenal-related figures that would play an important part in the story of Chelsea’s history). Norris had turned down their offer, so the Mears brothers decided on forming their own side to fill the stadium (Norris was also keen on merging Arsenal with Fulham, meaning that in an alternative universe we could have been supporters of ‘Fulham Arsenal FC’ who played their home games at Stamford Bridge with Chelsea FC having never existed!).

The Blues were founded in March 1905 and were immediately admitted to the Football League by the start of the 1905/06 season, after their application to join the Southern League had been rejected as a result of the objections of Fulham and Tottenham Hotspur. Chelsea became London’s second Football League side, after Arsenal who joined twelve years earlier. Rather like the introduction of Roman Abramovich ninety eight years later, in 1905 Chelsea built a side through poaching established players from other clubs, the most notable of which was their goalkeeper and first ever Captain, William ‘Fatty’ Foulke. Unlike the ribbing of Frank Lampard Jnr. a century later, Foulke genuinely was obese, weighing in at over twenty four stone. Foulke was often described as one of the game’s first celebrity players, however was to die just over a decade later as a result of Cirrhosis of the Liver (this here is the Horrible Histories take on the life of ‘Fatty’).

In their first ever season Chelsea finished third in Division Two and then promoted to the first the following season, finishing second. The star purchases also did the trick of attracting the crowds, with Chelsea having the highest average gate in the country between 1907 and the outbreak of the first world war (including a then First Division record of 65,000 for the first ever London derby in the Football League between Chelsea and Woolwich Arsenal in 1907 when Arsenal’s attendances at the time were actually a fraction of this figure). Actual trophy wins however were to allude Chelsea throughout this period, though Stamford Bridge did get to host the FA Cup Final three years in a row between 1920 and 1922 and may possibly have even eventually been the Cup Final’s perennial host had Wembley not been purpose built to host the British Empire Exhibition of 1924.

Chelsea were relegated back to Division Two in 1924, just ahead of Arsenal appointing Herbert Chapman who turned Arsenal into London’s first consistent trophy winning outfit and the capital’s first League Champions in 1931. Chelsea however did return to the top flight that season and did knock FA Cup holders Arsenal out of the competition with a 1-2 defeat at Stamford Bridge. Ironically, the man who Chapman replaced at Arsenal – Leslie Knighton – was to take over as manager at Stamford Bridge in 1933, however was no more successful at Stamford Bridge than he had been at Highbury with Chelsea either fighting relegation or enduring mid-table mediocrity for most of that decade.

Chelsea also had to endure Arsenal winning the title on their ground two seasons running, with a 3-1 win in April 1933 in front of a 72,000 crowd with goals from David Jack and two for Cliff Bastin, with former Newcastle hero Hughie Gallacher netting for the Pensioners. Exactly twelve months later, a 2-2 draw in front of a crowd of 65,000 was enough to secure the title for Arsenal with Alex James and Cliff Bastin among the goals. When Champions Arsenal visited Stamford Bridge the following season Chelsea were to achieve an attendance of 82,905, a club record which remains to this very day.

Chelsea were to start the 1937/38 season with an impressive 6-1 victory over Liverpool at Stamford Bridge. and in October of that season played out a 2-2 draw with Arsenal at Stamford Bridge before the Pathe Newsreel cameras, however finished that season in lowly tenth position. During the War, Chelsea were to make their Wembley debut in the 1944 Football League Cup Final against Charlton, however were to lose that meeting 3-1. This footage a @00.33 shows ‘Genial’ George Allison discussing the game with future American President General Dwight Eisenhower who presented Charlton with their winner’s trophy (George during his journalist days was actually the New York Post’s London correspondent between 1911 and when he took over from Herbert Chapman as Arsenal manager in 1934).

After the Second World War Chelsea (as did Arsenal) faced a touring Moscow Dynamo side at Stamford Bridge which resulted in a 3-3 draw and a cementing of Anglo-Russian relations which would obviously hold Chelsea in good stead post-2003. In 1948 (one year on from India gaining independence from the British Empire) Stamford Bridge played host to the Maharajah Lokendra Singhat at Stamford Bridge, here being put through his paces in a training session with Chelsea forward Tommy Walker. Chelsea however would have to wait until the appointment of former Arsenal forward Ted Drake as manager in 1952 before they were able to join the ranks of English football royalty. Just ahead of Drake’s appointment, Chelsea would progress to the Semi Finals of the FA Cup before being eliminated by Arsenal on both occasions.

In the 1950 semi, Chelsea took a two goal lead over Arsenal at White Hart Lane, with both strikes coming from Roy Bentley. Arsenal got back into the game ahead of half time with a freak Freddie Cox corner which went into the goal direct and Leslie Compton heading in from a corner by his brother Dennis to save the day. Arsenal would go on to win the replay 1-0 after extra time with a goal by Freddie Cox four days later in front of 66,482 fans at White Hart Lane. Two years later, Arsenal’s tie with Chelsea at White Hart Lane would initially be snowed off. When finally played, the sides drew 1-1 in front of 68,084 again at White Hart Lane with Freddie Cox again among the goals. Arsenal’s crowded run in that season saw this tie replayed just 48 hours later, this time Arsenal comprehensively triumphed with a 3-0 win. Freddie Cox was again among the goals, bagging two while Doug Lishman sealed the tie with a third Arsenal goal.

Following on from England’s shock 3-6 defeat to the Hungarians at Wembley in 1953, one year on Chelsea would play a high profile friendly with Hungary’s second side Red Banner FC (later renamed MTK Budapest) which resulted in a 2-2 draw and an amazing three penalties missed by both sides. Twelve months on however, Chelsea would finally have a trophy to their name after fifty years of trying after sealing the 1955 First Division title. Ted Drake’s title win had been even more astounding given the fact that in the four seasons which preceded the title, Chelsea had finished within the bottom four positions of the First Division on three occasions and even started the 1954/55 season with four consecutive defeats, lying in twelve position as late as November and their tally of 52 points one of the lowest ever to win the league under the two points for a win system (something to give Jose hope after his poor start this season).

Chelsea could have been the first English side to compete in UEFA’s newly formed European Champions Cup in 1955/56, however the FA vetoed Chelsea’s participation. Chelsea’s place at the top of English football however was not to last, as the Blues were to finish in the bottom half of the table for the next seven seasons, despite developing the talents of upcoming striker Jimmy Greaves. Chelsea would also suffer a humiliating 1-4 defeat away at Darlington in an FA Cup Fourth Round replay in 1958, followed by relegation to the second tier after finishing rock bottom in 1961/62, though would return at the first attempt a year later.

The 1960s is the first time in their history when Chelsea pushed for honours on a regular basis, with the appointment of Tommy Docherty in 1961 as player-manager, who at the time was a 33 year old playing out the twilight of his career at Arsenal. The Doc began to build the foundations of a young side which included players like Terry Venables, George Graham, Ron Harris and Peter Bonetti. In 1964/65, Chelsea won their first League Cup against Leicester back in the days when the final was a two legged affair and by March were top of the league and in the running for an unprecedented treble. It all began to turn sour however with a trip to Old Trafford against Matt Busby’s Manchester United – the eventual League Champions that season – who ran out 4-0 winners. The Cup was also to be lost in the Semi Final in a 0-2 defeat at Villa Park to a Liverpool side who replayed an away European tie 48 hours earlier, in the days before penalties only winning through on the toss of a coin.

Chelsea’s season was to finally implode spectacularly against Burnley, as the Doc had Chelsea set up camp on the eve of the game in Blackpool with Terry Venables, George Graham, Eddie McCreadie, John Hollins, Marvin Hinton, Barry Bridges, Bert Murray and Joe Fascione all dropped from the side and sent home for breaking a curfew after a night’s drinking on the town. Chelsea went on to receive a 2-6 hammering at Turf Moor, which all but ended their title hopes. For Chelsea under the Doc, there would be a Semi-Final defeat the following season and an FA Cup Final defeat in the first ever all-London FA Cup Final in 1967, won by Tottenham 2-1.

In the league too, throughout the 1960s Chelsea were consistently finishing in the top half of the table. Arsenal also failed to score a victory against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge for the rest of the 1960s after the Blues returned to the top flight in 1963. Even at Highbury, Arsenal would only defeat Chelsea the once over the same period. To make matters worse, with the fashionable Kings Road nearby Chelsea also began to steal Arsenal’s thunder as London’s glamour club. During the 1930s Arsenal attracted Babe Ruth, Buster Keaton, Jean Harlow and Mary Pickford who all took in a game at Highbury, however by the 1960s Stamford Bridge played host to Michael Caine, Steve McQueen, Raquel Welch, Terence Stamp and Richard Attenborough.

Despite this, on the Doc’s departure amid dressing room unrest in 1967, Chelsea again turned to Highbury for his replacement with Bertie Mee’s assistant Dave Sexton taking over at the helm at Stamford Bridge (ironically, Sexton would take over from the Doc again a decade later at Old Trafford). However, as seen from this episode of LWT’s often overlooked Cult 1970s Comedy Drama and Delboy ancestor ‘Budgie’, the Doc wasn’t the only Scotsman in this corner of West London trying to lay down his own brand of discipline. And clearly, from this episode you can see that Stamford Bridge attracted the clientele of cynical mercenaries and dubious businessmen even then! Under Sexton however, the balance remained in Chelsea’s favour as shown by this 0-3 defeat for Arsenal at Stamford Bridge in September 1969 with two goals for Alan Birchenall and Arsenal old boy Tommy Baldwin.

At the end of that season Chelsea would secure their first ever FA Cup beating Leeds United, drawing 2-2 in the first game (Wembley’s first ever drawn final after forty seven years!) but prevailing 2-1 in the replay at Old Trafford (the latter game with twenty eight and a half million viewers is still the most watched FA Cup Final ever). On entering the 1970s however, the balance would slowly tip back towards Arsenal’s favour. However earlier in the double season, Chelsea would inflict a 1-2 defeat on Arsenal at Stamford Bridge (@54.42) . Later that season Chelsea would win their final major trophy for another twenty six years, beating Real Madrid in the final of the European Cup Winners Cup back in the days when European finals were replayed, drawing 1-1 in the first match and winning the replay 2-1.

Arsenal however would finally take all three points at Stamford Bridge after nearly a decade of waiting in October 1971, with a 2-1 win secured with two goals from Ray Kennedy. Another sign of Chelsea’s decline came in February 1972, with their FA Cup exit after losing a 2-0 lead to Orient, who pulled off a 3-2 win at Brisbane Road. In January 1973, Arsenal would pull of a second win at Stamford Bridge in as many years, with a 1-0 win secured with another goal for Ray Kennedy (you’ll notice that this footage ends with Chelsea forward Bill Garner spelling out his name to the referee booking him, which was kind of ironic as Garner would go into the teaching profession on retirement and was a PE teacher at the bog standard Essex comprehensive attended by yours truly!). Arsenal would return to Stamford Bridge just a couple of months later in the FA Cup Quarter Final which ended in a 2-2 draw with Match of the Day’s goal of the season scored by Chelsea’s Peter Osgood. Arsenal however would go on to win the replay at Highbury.

You’ll notice from both 1973 games at Stamford Bridge that the stand opposite the camera resembles a building site, as Chelsea’s audacious plans for a 50,000 all seated stadium got under way. However, though oil would come to Chelsea’s rescue thirty years later, in 1973 it was to be Chelsea’s downfall as the OPEC cartel of oil producing nation’s quadrupled the price of a barrel of crude oil and inflicted the first global recession of the post-war era, meaning that from the rebuilding project Chelsea built just one new stand which was seriously over budget. The knock on effect of Chelsea’s financial woes hit the first team, with Chelsea relegated to the second tier at the end of 1974/75. Before Chelsea’s demotion Arsenal would secure one last win, with a 3-1 victory secured with goals from John Radford and two for Ray Kennedy. Chelsea’s relegation was all but confirmed by defeat to a Tottenham side also battling a relegation scrap at White Hart Lane on the penultimate Saturday of the season.

As will be seen tomorrow, this led to a yo-yo period for Chelsea who were to be relegated three times over the next thirteen seasons, failing to win another major trophy until the late 1990s.


NEW! Subscribe to our weekly Gooner Fanzine newsletter for all the latest news, views, and videos from the intelligent voice of Arsenal supporters since 1987.

Please note that we will not share your email address with any 3rd parties.


Article Rating

Leave a comment

Sign-in with your Online Gooner forum login to add your comment. If you do not have a login register here.

26
comments

  1. mbg

    Sep 18, 2015, 17:54 #75946

    Now we have learned something today haven't we.

  2. Exeter Gunner

    Sep 18, 2015, 17:43 #75944

    Bad form, Robert Exley, both the 'Chelsea fan' barb and telling people to basically f- off if they disagree with you. You have written an article which you know will have comments underneath it. Not all may agree. That's the format you have willingly exposed yourself too. As it happens in this instance, it's not your (very informative) article but your own comments underneath it through which you have found yourself in a disagreement, which you seem unable to handle rationally.

  3. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 17:20 #75941

    Buying players from abroad back then was still a novelty and not the norm as you well know. Some of you are so badly riddled with dislike of any Club that isn't our own. Its quite juvenile, if not pathetic. Fact is that teams earn success on the pitch by being well managed and its this that irks a lot of you, so you attribute money alone as the only variable to explain Arsenals lack of comparitve success. The money is just a factor in making it happen. Nobody denies the cash doesn't help. It wasn't me who compared 30s Arsenal to the modern Chelsea either, but it was a fair point to make by whoever did.

  4. Westlower

    Sep 18, 2015, 17:14 #75940

    We could do with this team at the Bridge tomorrow. They beat Chelsea 3-1 at Highbury in 1987/88. Lukic, Thomas, Sansom, Williams, O'Leary, Adams, Rocastle, Davis, Smith, Groves, Richardson. 2 goals from Kevin Richardson + OG.

  5. Platitude Problem

    Sep 18, 2015, 16:49 #75939

    'This is why club's get in expensively paid coach's' - er...leaving aside the exceptionally poor use of an apostrophe Ron, you would surely need a lot of money to hire and keep an expensively paid coach, right? But no, money doesn't buy success does it?

  6. Robert Exley

    Sep 18, 2015, 16:05 #75934

    Ron - Waste of time trying to liken spending yrs back to now? So waste of time likening Arsenal in the 30s to Chelsea now surely (duh!). No international player market back in the late 70s/early 80s? Really, no Arnold Muhren, Frans Thijsssen, Ossie Ardiles or Brady moving to Italy then? Money doesn't buy success in modern football? Really. Just a coincidence the same top four perpetuity include two oligarch clubs, the best supported and richest non-oligarch side in the country and the richest and best supported non-oligarch side in the richest part of the country. And that the equivalent of sides who used to challenge for titles - Derby, Forest, Ipswich, Watford - now lucky to reach Europa League, such as Southampton, Swansea or Leicester. Again, any complaints about the content, just put Google to use and read something else. I don't tailor my articles to Chelsea fans. Sorry.

  7. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 13:57 #75917

    Waste of time trying to liken spending yrs back to now Robert. There wasnt even an international player market back then for eg. Yr posts betray an irrational dislike for Chelsea though (in fairness, as many do) but yr comments are compromised by the inherent bias. Not sure why i'd want to go to a Chelsea site either. Ive no interest in the Club save for what i see of them on a Saturday/Sunday afternoon. If it helps fuel your ire though, i see them at least once per season at Villa Park Bham on a 'complimentary'. Make of that what you will if you want to.For the moment you've still not shown how money itself 'buys success'. It cant buy happiness either but it helps. Chelsea s success has come from having top players, assembled into the right positions by very good Coach's who have imbued the Club with a fighting mentality to complement the skill. Something that AFC are incapable of or have forgotten to create. This is why Clubs get in expensively paid Coach's. Under your take on things, the Cheltenham Town Manager, you or me could go into Chelsea or City and win the title/CL. Such a notion is plain daft, but carry on detesting if you must. PS Chelsea fans have long held an affinity with train drama. Nobody could smash up 'football specials' like they did back in the day.It was their forte.

  8. Robert Exley

    Sep 18, 2015, 13:31 #75913

    Ron - I'm too pre-occupied to have the information to hand, but I'm pretty sure the net spend of Clough prior to winning the League and European Cup is way lower than Chelsea did to win their first League title for 50 years (as I said, nowhere) and European Cup, even taking the inflation adjustment into account. And when Forest spent big on a player, they had to recoup that without a sugar daddy and if the gamble didn't pay off (i.e. Justin Fashanu) it screwed them up for a few years, compared to Chelsea who wasted money on Veron and Mutu and still went on spending. And if you don't like the content Ron, you can always go back to the Chelsea forums (though trolling on the internet is a marked improvement from throwing black people off a subway train I grant you)

  9. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 13:11 #75911

    Torbay - hi mate. I know nothing of his family stuff im afraid, though recall his Mother being up for some petty crime a few yrs back now you mention it?

  10. mbg

    Sep 18, 2015, 13:07 #75910

    Some good posts on here this morning and afternoon, i bet it has the wengerites spitting that their messiah and his failed philosophies hasn't or isn't afforded the same respect.

  11. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 12:37 #75906

    Chelsea and Man City aren't 'nowhere Clubs' at all. Again. Notts Forest spent quite big on key players to create such a team. Shiltons fee for e.g. raised eyebrows at the time for a keeper. Trevor Francis s fee was phenomenal too. Its all relative. They did have Cloughs magnetism and genius too. Great management and a team chemistry creates success, the money per se doesnt and never will. Its a handy crutch for navel gazing Arsenal fans to lean on though, while they seek a scapegoat to explain the Clubs present malaise instead of looking at the root and branch failings within the Club. You purport to write about football history yet with all due respect you dont seem to have any knowledge of it or if you do, its blinkered and biased.

  12. mbg

    Sep 18, 2015, 12:31 #75905

    Ron, 80304, your dead right there, instead of a bunch of pansie nice boys that everybody loves because they've got a lovely baby face.

  13. Torbay gooner

    Sep 18, 2015, 12:10 #75902

    Hi Ron, understand completely that Terry is a leader on the pitch and his medals testify to his success. However, off the pitch he has a rap sheet, as long as his ugly mug. He has been involved in too many 'incidents' down the years and looking at his family, the apple certainly did n't fall far from that tree.

  14. Robert Exley

    Sep 18, 2015, 12:08 #75901

    Ron - if you think 'buying success' is a myth, why do teams like Chelsea and Man City, acquiring an oligarch come from nowhere to win League and European Cups, where teams like Nottingham Forest (who did both 35 years ago, but acquired nothing other a decent manager) no longer do?

  15. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 11:42 #75899

    Torbay - Ha. Yes Terry does cause that feeling doesn't he. I wish we had a few though who other teams fans hated. It usually means they're good, often the best at what they do and that they win the big trophies. Terry has done that for all his imagery. It might be off piste to say it but i honestly reckon Terry tarnished image has been down to some dubious evidence presented by the Ferdinand family (hardly paragons of virtue, though the TV s doing its best to make Rio one!). The thing over the bird - Wayne Bridge thing. Seemed like some thing that happens all the time to me. Media and Bridge razzed it up for all it was worth. It gave Bridge the chance to be a central celebrity and victim for once that his limited football abilities were never going to allow him to do. Mr ordinary having his 15 mins of fame off the back of some loose t--ts proclivities it seemed like to me.

  16. Torbay gooner

    Sep 18, 2015, 11:27 #75896

    Yes Ron, Chelski were my '2nd' team when I was a kid. I saw them train once, when their training ground was in Mitchum. I took my autograph book along and got Bonetti's David Hay's Droy's, Britton's and a very young Ray Wilkins amongst others. I have disliked them for a while now though, captained by the repulsive John Terry it would be hard not to. Would take a draw tomorrow, but cannot see beyond our usual timid performance against them.

  17. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 11:17 #75893

    Thats another myth Robert - the 'buying of success'. Money buys good players. Managers and players secure 'success' and moreover, Liverpool Man Utd Sunderland Charlton Wolves Everton Arsenal Blackburn Tottenham have all had heady spells as the big money Clubs and theyve accordingly bought the best players. Yr response to Wearebulding seems very much tinged with anti Chelsea envy sentiment. Football history will always find parallels. City and Chelsea arent now and never have been unique from whats gone before. Its just a question of degree and method that makes them seem unique. Man Utd for 26 years had cash to burn and couldnt win a title. Couldn't get close yet they bought scores of top players who the other CLubs here couldnt afford. Liverpools halycon days was money fueled too. People chose to ignore that. Eg - when they bought Kenny Dalglish it was the equal in gravity to the purchase of Chelsea buying Didier Drogba and there are many other egs.

  18. WeAreBuildingATeamToDominate

    Sep 18, 2015, 11:16 #75892

    Robert Exley; granted you couldn't just go out and do a Man City in those days, no, but the club certainly weren't averse to splashing the cash if the need arose. Alex James, David Jack, Bryn Jones to name but three.

  19. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 11:06 #75891

    I still think they might win the title Tony, though ive a sneaking feeling that JM really wants the CL in his locker as Chelsea boss and its maybe that their league form will be affected. City have always had 'self destruct' in their repertoire going back decades. Can never rely on them. Always a bit 'maverick'. Thats part of their attraction and it was like that back in the Lee Bell and Summerbee days too wasnt it. Mourinhos teams do have the same fibre and substance as GGs best sides dont they.They ll be fine. People are just dining out on Mourinho losing a few. Cant see Arsenal winning at the Bridge either. The Club lacks the balls nous and mindset to go there and capitalise on Chelseas present frailties.They ll still go and play damage limitation stuff.

  20. Robert Exley

    Sep 18, 2015, 10:58 #75890

    WeAreBuildingATeamToDominate - Slight difference with Arsenal 1930-53 is that the maximum wage and retain and transfer limited the extent to which we could buy success

  21. Tony Evans

    Sep 18, 2015, 10:51 #75889

    Hi Ron - I liked the late 60s, early 70s Chelsea side and loved it when they beat Leeds in the '70 cup final. I still have no problem with them now and only envy their supporters because I wish my club still showed the same ambition. The blend of physical and skilful players they have now reminds me of Wenger's heydays (a distant memory obviously!) and it irks that we had the magic formula, only to see it thrown away and taken up by another club. OK they have started badly but I bet they finish higher than we do.

  22. Ron

    Sep 18, 2015, 10:23 #75887

    There was a time in the 60s and early 70s and then again in the Zola and Co yrs that Chelsea were very popular and many had them down as their 'second Club'. As a kid i recall the Docherty years, Tambling, Bridges Bonetti Murray and Co. They were an excellent side. Theyer football is good now and while Mourinho does place strength and discipline high on his agenda, theyve also played some great stuff in this last decade. Its only Arsenals more narrow minded brigade who condemn them in their putrid, evny ridden efforts to elevate feeble tippy tappy as in some way a 'superior' brand of football. Those who espouse such a line are in my view a bunch of deluded dreamers who need to take a deeper look at the myth of AFCs football. Its been weak and ineffective for 10 years and its getting no better.

  23. WeAreBuildingATeamToDominate

    Sep 18, 2015, 9:16 #75882

    Chelsea have plenty of history, and Stamford Bridge away was/is never an easy fixture. Looking at the respective history of our two clubs, you can even make a point that our history between 1929 and 1953 (ambitious manager(s), board willing to back them, trophies), is mirrored with their 2000's. Any argument about that? I can't see the difference.

  24. mbg

    Sep 17, 2015, 22:17 #75872

    They certainly have a history over us now where it matters, on the pitch, and a CL to go with it, thanks to an owner and manager who are ambitious and winners, unlike the excuse for a manager we have who is neither.

  25. Peter Wain

    Sep 17, 2015, 19:39 #75867

    next three away games will we score? Or will we be like a norwegian eurovision song entry nil points? I know which one my money's on.

  26. Ron

    Sep 17, 2015, 16:06 #75849

    I went to that 1970 FAC Replay at OT. Brilliant. Not sure how many neutrals were in there that night courtesy of a Utd fan mate at the time, but they and the viewers you mention were all Chelsea fans that night i venture.