Thoughts on City

United were the only winners on Wednesday evening



Thoughts on City

Mancini: Could actually have taken three points


West Brom
Newcastle
Sp*rs

The list of lesser clubs who have come the Grove this season and left with three points in their pockets.

Lesser clubs without the resources of the richly assembled Manchester City brick wall we faced last night, and without their supposed title ambitions.

Second in the league, last night was a chance to make a statement of their intentions to challenge for the title. Their over cautious approach, with ten men behind the ball at all times and Joe Hart taking a minute to take every goal kick from the first, suggests that, despite the investment, they still don't truly believe they can win the league.

Their Manchester neighbours won't be so reserved when they pay their visit. As City fans arrived for work yesterday morning, happy with their point, they found their United colleague's even happier with the result, as the cards begin to fall into place for Fergie's men.

I heard some defenders of City's approach compare the tactics employed to that of Jose Mourinho and his Inter Milan team last year, particularly their second leg display at Camp Nou in the Champions League Semi Final.

Here's the contrasts;

Despite our best attempts at imitation, we aren't Barcelona. Although Mourinho's Inter were based on a solid defence, they also managed to score three in the first leg. They had a desire to get into Barcelona's box and score. Scoring can be quite important in football. They did so three times, meaning they were even more defensive in the second leg with the final in sight. I understand that. I even liked it, because even if Inter were dull, Mourinho wasn't, and 90 minutes of defence, defence, defence were brought to a climax with him sprinting across the Camp Nou turf in wildly entertaining fashion.

We started with a high tempo and controlled the game throughout. We were unlucky not to go ahead, as we might have done if Wilshere been more decisive in shooting, or the rebound off the post from Van Persie and Cesc was kinder in our favour.

In the second half our tempo understandably dropped, and City became even more reserved. It was all too evident by around the seventy minute mark that we were physically spent. We were still allowed as much of the ball as we wanted, but our ability to break our opponents down and create chances decreased because we were knackered.

And this is where Mancini's tactics could've proved golden, and three points might have been stolen had they shown half an inclination to do so.

After nullifying us for the majority of the game, we were then there to be taken advantage of. West Brom, Newcastle and Sp*rs have done so in the too recent past, yet even though the introduction of Johnson meant City then had two players with attacking instincts as opposed to the lonely Tevez, they didn't threaten. They didn't want to.

Perhaps we should take small credit for this. Gael Clichy was having his finest game of the season and Alex Song was also superb. Djourou is now the main centre back in Vermaelen's ever extending absence, and he again showed why.

When the freshness of our fine first half display was fading, we needed a contribution from the substitutes. Arshavin did little but frustrate. Bendtner was playing wide when his presence would surely have been more beneficial in the box. Chamakh seems to have been granted a mid-season break following his exertions in the first half of the campaign.

Afterwards, Arsene said we had the performance we wanted, but not the result. Spot on. It makes catching United that little bit harder, but we almost did all that we could.

Two clean sheets in a row is a pleasing stat, despite it not being hard to keep the blunt pencil that was City at bay.

The point they came for was bored out. Arsenal frustrated. City happy. United happier.

*** For more of my Arsenal based ramblings, follow me on Twitter @TheArsenal_


NEW! Subscribe to our weekly Gooner Fanzine newsletter for all the latest news, views, and videos from the intelligent voice of Arsenal supporters since 1987.

Please note that we will not share your email address with any 3rd parties.


Article Rating

Leave a comment

Sign-in with your Online Gooner forum login to add your comment. If you do not have a login register here.

7
comments

  1. Joe Mardon

    Jan 10, 2011, 9:47 #702

    The 2005 Cup Final is the one that really sticks out in comparison to the City performance. In Copenhagen in 94 at least we had a shot on target. City could have kicked on and taken advantage of a tiring side. Had they done so, the tactics would have been spot on.

  2. Jan 09, 2011, 18:34 #693

    As frustrating as the result was (and Paul is spot on here), we've got results in the past playing like City did. In no way would I swap our offensive game for the display City put on, but we are not even capable of defending/holding on to a point so resolutely. Perhaps if we were, we'd be more realistic title contenders rather than in my opinion, pretenders.

  3. Paul

    Jan 08, 2011, 7:40 #679

    artful did you not see the 2005 cup final then? Or the Parma final in 94? Arsenal have won trophies the way City played the other night.

  4. artful gooner

    Jan 07, 2011, 21:44 #678

    re the city game. I would rather watch arsenal playing as they did and not winning the league than to play like man city and win the league

  5. Frank

    Jan 07, 2011, 18:49 #676

    chris dee it would be difficult even for Flappy not to keep a clean sheet if the opposition doesnt have one shot on target!!!

  6. chrisy boy

    Jan 07, 2011, 12:34 #671

    to chris dee, you beat me to it, that adrian durham is a prick, all you gooners listen to him and make your own minds up. If trying to get over the dartford crossing every evening wasnt bad enough, listening to him makes it worse. I know i could just change radio channels but trust me my fellow gooners he is a joke, listen yourself then phone him up and give him what for !

  7. chris dee

    Jan 07, 2011, 10:30 #668

    I think our performance bodes well for the rest of the season.The best part of our performance was the clean sheet. How many times have we dominated games and then lost or drawn games after a costly slip up in defence due to lack of organisation or concentration? So hopefully Arsene, the penny has dropped regarding or defence. The media led 'haven't won anything in five years'crap is doing my head in. It's worth repeating ,the stadium cost of 365 million,we had to finance the stadium and try and stay competitive because we could and would not not spend obscene amounts on transfers like the Birmingham City of the South,Chelsea and a club living in permanent debt United. It would take a good organisation,courage and skill from the board and manager.It has worked. Apart from Chelsea and United two other teams have won trophies in the last five years are Liverpool and Portsmouth.Liverpool are stuggling and cannot finance tranfers or even afford a bag of B & Q cement for a new stadium and Portsmouth spent fortunes on transfers and wages they could not afford,thanks to a certain manager,and have gone belly up. Betcha they wish they were in our position,and who knows we might win something this year. P .S.Sorry to go on,but how much longer will the daily outrageous slagging off and micky taking of our club occur on Talk Sport in The Adrian Durham show? Obviously the man has no jounalistic talent so has to wind up Arsenal fans to get them to ring in and so justify his wages.And as for his guffawing nodding dog partner Darren Gough,what a prat.