Dancing to the officials’ Toon

Half time departure for competence, with a minority of disgruntled St James’ Park public



Dancing to the officials’ Toon

Dowd: Exactly what was that second penalty given for?


The momentum which carried this team has come to a shuddering halt. Everybody, it seems, was delighted – with the exception of the bemused Arsenal contingent – after we threw away a four goal lead at Newcastle. Sky have goals to play on loop; Phil Dowd has the elation of his infamy and Joey Barton can have claimed to have got his side out of jail. When you consider the irony of Barton being involved in a concerted effort to avoid jail, you can appreciate the extent of the madness which unfolded at St. James’ Park.

To gauge the context of this match, one has to remember the Huddersfield and Everton games. After much ado about nothing from their near neighbours during the F A Cup third round ties, The Terriers could have felt justifiably disappointed to be eliminated by the poorer team on the day. During that game, two key moments highlighted refereeing inconsistency. There can be few complaints about Sebastien Squillaci’s dismissal before half time; but equally it is amazing that Mark Clattenburg allowed Jamie McCombe to remain on the pitch, after upending Nicklas Bendtner for the decisive penalty kick.

Following defeat, David Moyes appeared incensed by Cesc’s remonstrations with the referee. The home crowd were quick to summarise the real villain of the piece – “1 – 0 to the referee” serving as both accusation and match report for the first half. In the end, justice was done – and unlike Huddersfield, Everton could have no basis for indignation.

Undeniably, Newcastle United should have been beaten, having conceded twice before many fans would have taken their seats. To their credit, even at 4 – 0, the majority of Newcastle supporters continued to voice encouragement for their side. It must be hard enough to muster song at that point, without the extra burden of their side being managed by a man whose only qualification for replacing Chris Hughton is his friendship with Mike Ashley. For different reasons, I very much doubt that either featured on Arsene Wenger’s Christmas card list.

Dowd set the scene for the second half by allowing Barton’s crude challenge on Arshavin to go without caution, just before the interval. As so often happens, with no deterrent offered, Newcastle United set about “getting stuck in” at the beginning of the second half. Losing Djourou, replaced by the hapless Squillaci, was the first key indicator that there may be trouble ahead. (It seems that “hapless” will soon replace Sebastien as the preferred prefix). The challenge which prompted Abou Diaby’s moronic retaliation merited at least a yellow for Barton. The dismissal turned the game – and presented Dowd the platform from which to claim the man of the match award for The Toon.

The first penalty would have been given at Old Trafford, if in United’s favour. Immediately after the spot kick, Wojciech Szczesny was thrown to the ground by Kevin Nolan, protesting at perceived time wasting. What differentiation Dowd made between that assault and Diaby’s is beyond my simple comprehension. He then proceeded to disallow a goal for Leon Best, when Rosicky had clearly played him onside. Best forced himself on to the score sheet, before Dowd’s pièce de résistance.

The second penalty award was astonishing – if you have seen the highlights, you will have spotted the fourth official’s attempts to distance himself from his colleague, as Arsene Wenger expressed his disgust. That Match of the Day’s “finest” concurred with Wenger needs no further elaboration. The equally errant assistant, Mr. Massey maintained equilibrium in disallowing Robin van Persie’s deft chip at the death. Had the officials performed with any level of competence, Arsenal would have prevailed by the odd goal in nine. As it is, this game will now be talked about in the same breath as the capitulations against Spurs at home (twice), Wigan (twice), Liverpool (twice) and worse still, Ipswich (away), Shakhtar Donetsk (away) and Partizan Belgrade (away). There are other embarrassments which I could add, but would rather forget.

The Manchester United “Invincibles” faltered in the late kick off. Whilst I still think that they will win the title, I had no doubt that they would lose at least once in doing so. Moreover, there was a suspicion that it would be against a team less fancied to shatter the dreams of The Cockney Reds and large sections of the media. Although the defeat serves to underline the enormity of the achievement in 2004; I wonder how Ferguson’s men will react to this setback. Wenger allowed his charges to sulk for an age; whatever the arguments following Mr. Riley’s officiating during that 2 – 0 reverse at Old Trafford. I do not anticipate a similar reaction by United and therein lies possibly the most telling difference between the mentalities of the two camps.

So what can the squad learn from Saturday that we do not already know? Jack Wilshere will probably find out that his public exasperation will prove both fruitless and expensive – the FA will use the outburst in much the same way that David Moyes focussed on Cesc’s musings. We know that some of the second string have neither the quality nor brains to adequately cover for their more accomplished counterparts. We also know that, rather than admonish the idiocy of their surrender, that Wenger will soothe egos and tell them that they are the best. Those credentials have been belied yet again. I am afraid that Barcelona will ridicule this misrepresentation in the next few weeks.

With that in mind, I think that the absences of Song, Nasri and Vermaelen against Barcelona can only exacerbate the potential for humiliation; rather than simply account for it. My main focus for the immediate future, despite United losing, is the opportunity to win silverware on 27 February.

Football can be cruel: Newcastle United helped to reaffirm that. It can also be horribly ironic. Obafemi Martins went through a period when he was constantly linked with Arsenal. Now, he has the chance to show us what we might have missed. Birmingham City have form when it comes to dishing out the rough stuff and are more than happy to take advantage of the kind of generosity which Phil Dowd offered Joey Barton and Kevin Nolan. It is crucial that we have the best possible eleven available for that game. It is equally important that each player retains a focus and professionalism.

I have every expectation that Alex McLeish will send his team out with a reminder of how The Netherlands dealt with Spain in the last World Cup Final. Although ultimately unsuccessful, we know that there is unlikely to be the same criticism levelled as was heaped on the Dutch, if Birmingham employ those “tactics”. Mike Dean is well known to Arsenal fans. A simple Google search – “Mike Dean Arsenal” – is sufficient to conjure numerous memories of injustices of which he has certainly been the catalyst. That Arsenal are often the authors of their own misfortune cannot be denied. However, if any positive is to be gained from the experience at St. James’ Park, I hope that it manifests itself at Wembley.

Just as karma dictated that Louis Saha should have a perfectly valid goal chalked off against Blackpool – again, owing to substandard officiating – so we can use this recent horror as inspiration for success. Facing adversity and learning from it; enduring the pain with stoic determination, is the preserve of winners and the formula which should end our wait for a pot on the sideboard. Graft and grit – if we can match Birmingham City for these qualities, we can expose them for what they are in terms of collective football acumen. Applied over the remainder of the season, we can also ensure Champions League football for next season, which I think is entirely achievable.

Beyond that, anything else would be a fantastic bonus – and one which recent history would suggest is as unlikely as recovery from a four goal deficit. Of course, if we finish the season as champions, I would be more than delighted to be proven wrong. After all, I thought that we wouldn’t beat Spurs in the third round of The Carling Cup – pessimist or realist? I live in hope that I will be shown to be a fool. It wouldn’t be the first time, nor will it be the last. Sadly, the same can also be said for the refereeing fraternity and their paymasters at the FA.


NEW! Subscribe to our weekly Gooner Fanzine newsletter for all the latest news, views, and videos from the intelligent voice of Arsenal supporters since 1987.

Please note that we will not share your email address with any 3rd parties.


Article Rating

Leave a comment

Sign-in with your Online Gooner forum login to add your comment. If you do not have a login register here.

32
comments

  1. willieyoungsgoldensyrup

    Feb 09, 2011, 15:34 #2208

    fair play to geordies,they wernt reffin the game.Sometimes im ashamed to share allegiance with sum of the hysterical fannys masqueradin as A.F.C-proper weapons. mind u that J.Barton is a massive t**t tho, his punch on pedersen comes to mind n his snide explanation of it when confronted by pedersen n ref-wot a soft arse

  2. fucknewcastleanddowd

    Feb 09, 2011, 6:18 #2187

    why r u idiots reading a pro-Arsenal article in the first place? Jackasses

  3. Steven

    Feb 09, 2011, 5:51 #2185

    We just need someone in midfield that is ready to break someones legs, once teams know we have someone there no one will attempt ridicoulos challenges on arsenal players. Why was keane so angry at viera? somply because keane got away with murder bar with veira around. boy i hope we would have signed felipe melo.

  4. Nick offside

    Feb 08, 2011, 19:41 #2164

    That means any defender lying on the ground isnt playing someone onside? Wrong, you dont seem to be able to grasp that being played onside by a defender is being played onside, period.

  5. Rob.

    Feb 08, 2011, 11:08 #2116

    BLIND GEORDIES ---------- WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE ********** WHAT ABOUT RVP's GOAL GIVEN OFFSIDE **********

  6. AugustusCaesar

    Feb 08, 2011, 10:53 #2109

    "The goal that Newcastle had chalked off WAS offside. What people seem to have missed is that Rosicky wasn't interfering with play, a rule that works both ways." No it doesn't. Sorry Nick but there is nothing in the laws of the game about interfering/not interfering with play from a defensive point of view. I've often wondered whether this might be introuduced one day but the linesman has a pretty tough job as it is. Can you imagine the carnage? On the Barton tackle on Diaby, I thought it was just about ok. He slid in with one leg and the second leg caught him on the follow through but it wasn't a scissors type action and certainly not a classic two footed lunge. Sometimes you will catch an opponent when you make a tackle, this is unavoidable. I think it was on the verge of recklessness but just about ok.

  7. Mitch

    Feb 08, 2011, 6:43 #2068

    Barton would be allowed to punch an opponent repeatedly in the face, as long as he won the ball first, right? Even if you consider Barton's tackle to be a fair one... rewind to the end of the first half. He scythes down Arshavin and then appears to stamp on Diaby, all within the space of 2 seconds. That's at least a yellow, even if you give him the benefit of the doubt that the stamp was accidental (though Barton doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt on anything) - possibly a red card. If either of those is properly punished, Barton probably doesn't make that tackle on Diaby that led to the sending off. That Barton ends the game without a single yellow is a joke. He made at minimum 1 yellow-worthy tackle (Arshavin), and another two that are quite possibly yellow or red (Diaby, and the stamp on Diaby), and then clearly dives to win the free kick against Rosicky for the final goal.

  8. Nick

    Feb 08, 2011, 4:52 #2067

    The goal that Newcastle had chalked off WAS offside. What people seem to have missed is that Rosicky wasn't interfering with play, a rule that works both ways. He was strolling back out on the wing and therefore inactive. Nolan should have gone as it was identical to Diaby's offence. The keeper does not have to give the ball back. When a goal is scored, the ball is the the possession of the team kicking off. And yes Barton's tackle was a foul, he got a bit of the ball but the law states you must tackle in a way that doesn't endanger another player, whether you win the ball or not. I won't even mention the penalties as there is no debate on those.

  9. Wombledin

    Feb 08, 2011, 3:34 #2065

    Very good article, especially the last two paragraphs. Enjoyed reading that, thanks.

  10. Why don't you Toon fans...

    Feb 07, 2011, 22:43 #2058

    ...stop clogging up Arsenal blogs with your inane gruntings? I know this result ranks alongside your club's best ever moments (christ knows you've had fuck all to celebrate in your lame existence), but coming on here and directing abuse at 'southern poofs' just shows you up to be unintelligent bigots (look it up). None of you are interested in actually commenting on the events of the match, or the referee's performance etc. Get a life, outside of your pitiful, Geordie goldfish bowl...

  11. marcus

    Feb 07, 2011, 22:11 #2056

    Charlie - for once and for all WINNING THE BALL IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO WHETHER OR NOT A TACKLE IS FAIR!!! I'm sick to death of morons who don't get this simple basic rule. DeJong's tackle on Ben Arfa was the exact same thing - follow thru onto Ben Arfa's leg, deliberate failure to even try to control his leg - Diaby's leg could've been broken, ffs!

  12. TFG's friend from South Wales

    Feb 07, 2011, 19:33 #2042

    TFG - the refereeing we're suffering from at the moment is imcompetent but not in my opinion biased or crooked. As for Diaby, he's a chump good and proper and I for one would love for Wenger to show him the same treatment he showed Nelson Vivas for a mistake that cost us the tital up at Leeds back in 99 (he showed him the door for those who aren't as old in the tooth as TFG and I). Diaby is a poor mans Vieira with not an ounce of common sense or discipline and I hate him for it! Meanwhile, congratulations to Newcastle for a superb comeback and all the best for rest of the season. I genuinely hope you eventually get the owner and manager a big club like yours truly deserves. Sadly I don't think you've got either at the moment.

  13. Tom

    Feb 07, 2011, 16:17 #2014

    We can blame the ref all we like.Saturdays capitulation was down to Wenger and the players.No team throws away a 4 goal lead except us

  14. AugustusCaesar

    Feb 07, 2011, 14:57 #2002

    Man U have thrown away points from winning positions this seasons. Albeit not from 4-0 but they were two up against West Brom at HOME and drew. They lead twice at Fulham including very late on and drew. And again on Saturday. They’re not completely infallible, far from it. I agree it is more endemic of us but ya know...a bit of perspective.

  15. Gooner S

    Feb 07, 2011, 13:19 #1981

    Because you never see any news reports of Newcastle fans complaining do you? Cockney Mafia out, etc. Shame 'the lads' haven't won a top flight trophy for 30 odd years isn't it?! lol!

  16. Ian McCarthy

    Feb 07, 2011, 13:18 #1980

    You are spot on that there is a massive difference between the mentalities of Manure and us. They will simply go out next time and win.

  17. AugustusCaesar

    Feb 07, 2011, 12:05 #1961

    Was VP's late strike offside? Some of his body was level, some was in front. Whatever happened to the 'daylight' directive? Was that thrown out for the frankly unintelligible offside equals: 'if any part of his body that can score a goal is in an offside position' Confused.

  18. TFG

    Feb 07, 2011, 11:14 #1944

    Thank you for your comments. There is one point which occurred to me after I posted this piece, which came to mind reading the observations made by various Magpies. I thought that I had made it plain that Diaby was moronic - that the team lacked steel and I intimated that very few teams would have surrendered such a lead. Consider this: Cheik Tiote's strike was magnificent, given the timing and technique - there can be little argument about that. Equally, it was a goal out of the ordinary - suppose, on another day, it had landed in Row Z. Having disallowed a perfectly good goal by Best, would Mr Dowd have been be any more competent, in my view, because Arsenal would have won the game in such circumstances? No!

  19. GoonerRon

    Feb 07, 2011, 10:53 #1934

    I've watched the first penalty loads of times and still can't see where there was contact. It was a clumsy looking coming together but was very soft in my opinion.

  20. Paul

    Feb 07, 2011, 10:43 #1931

    At least with dowd refereeing last years carling cup final(where he failed to send off vidic) he wont be doing this years.

  21. El Toro

    Feb 07, 2011, 10:33 #1929

    "The equally errant assistant, Mr. Massey maintained equilibrium in disallowing Robin van Persie’s deft chip at the death." No. Video evidence has since PROVED Van Persie was marginally offside. It was marginal, but correct.

  22. al-k-traz

    Feb 07, 2011, 10:23 #1924

    Biased hogwash. You can't defend a 4 goal lead, and everyone and everything but your own team is to blame. Take your red specs off, and perhaps you will realise you're supporting a team of whinging softies who seem to want to play non-contact football.

  23. John Gilbert

    Feb 07, 2011, 10:02 #1914

    Sir, I must admit to being an NUFC fan and I find your team the best to watch in the league. From an outsider's point of view,, you really need some steel in your team. I play the game and as a defender, I thought Barton's challenge was fair: he slid in and took the ball. He did not leap two-footed into the tackle and did not lead with his studs. Diaby saw him coming and chose to take the hit. He could easily have side-stepped him or better yet (for your team), have realised he was not going to win and tried to intercept Barton's toe-poke. That said, Barton's challenge on Arshavin should have merited a booking and so should Nolan's grab on your 'keeper. You have reason to feel aggrieved but I believe that you have more reason to bemoan a lack in your own team. I guess the telling question is this: Would ManUre have let a team score four when only one man down?

  24. Barrack Road

    Feb 07, 2011, 9:27 #1892

    Reality check for you: Barton's tackle was more than fair, Diaby was correctly sent off, First penalty was spot on - tackle from behind with no ball won, Bests disallowed goal was fine - Rosicky played him on from Left Back, Second penalty was a decent shout - Koscielny did OK with Williamson however Rosicky came steaming in and pushed him! And 5 keepers in your goal couldn't have saved Tiote's pile driver. Arsenal fans really need to take a long hard look at their team spirit, or lack of. Going down to 10 men totally destroyed your team. 4-0 and you f***ed it up! HWTL!

  25. Hrochnick

    Feb 07, 2011, 9:26 #1886

    Look again, Barton's tackle on Diaby was two footed and off the ground and it doesn't matter if you win the ball first or not. Will the proponents of hard tackling ever understand that? It was a foul and a nasty one.

  26. Feb 07, 2011, 8:21 #1843

    pick your dummy up!!!

  27. Paul NUFC

    Feb 07, 2011, 8:21 #1841

    Interesting read, a few points to pick up on! Joey Barton's tackle on Diaby was tough but fair, not two footed,not off the ground, not studs showing = fair. No amount of blaming Barton excuses Diaby's idiotic behaviour. The First penalty was a cartainty tackling from behind going through the man and not getting the ball, certain penatly. Second Penalty I thought was very soft and I would be disappointed should it have been given against us. Maybe it was the Linesman making up for the fact that he had disallowed a perfectly good goal.(Leon Best) Regarding Van Persies chippd goal if you cant see that was offside you need your eyes testing. Instead of blaming boogey men like Joey Barton and Phil Dowd, you should blame the lack of heart and determination in your side, it's all fine and well trying to pass like Barcelona but no Guts no Glory and thats why you won't win the league again.

  28. I feel sorry for you.

    Feb 07, 2011, 7:51 #1824

    oh dear. . it is very un-becoming to have such a rose-tinted view. Why not rejoice in the excellent football you see virtually every game. Revel in Viet that you have a super loyal fanbase in one of the world's most fickle football cities. Enjoy your team and world class manager. But please, try to have a modicum of realisation that some days, you just get out-played. Bitterness is not a good quality.

  29. Jay

    Feb 07, 2011, 7:37 #1816

    "What differentiation Dowd made between that assault and Diaby’s is beyond my simple comprehension." Absolutely none, hence why Nolan was also yellow carded. Unfortunately, Diaby pushed Barton to the ground AND then shoved Nolan from behind so was red carded. 1 + 1 does indeed equal 2 :)

  30. Paul

    Feb 07, 2011, 7:21 #1804

    After reading some of the comments from gooners about the game and referee's you really are all deluded goons

  31. Porciestreet

    Feb 07, 2011, 7:13 #1797

    Moan moan winge cry moan cry winge winge . cry moan bellyache . Yawn!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get your head out from your 4r5e and get on with it. Howay the Lads.

  32. Charlie

    Feb 07, 2011, 7:12 #1796

    I can understand the sour grapes but Barton did win the ball first and foremost in what was a hard but fair tackle. Just because Diaby has been injured does not earn him special treatment. Firstly a clear goal for NUFC called offside. Cards here and cards there but a goal is a much bigger decision to get wrong. The first penalty was clear as day. Second was given because Arsenal were panicking and throwing bodies around stupidly in the penalty box. As for Nolan it wasn't just percieved time wasting. You goalie was doing a runner and after picking up the ball was 12 feet from the goal mouth when Nolan got him. If he hadn't have acted the goose Nolan would have gone