Do you think Arsene even watched the F.A. Cup Final?

Lessons to be learned from Wembley showpiece



Do you think Arsene even watched the F.A. Cup Final?

Yaya Toure: Could have been a Gunner


To all of our collective Gooner relief, Manchester City saved us from having to witness the horror of Ryan Shawcross,Tony Pulis or the javelin thrower getting their paws on the F.A. Cup. What we all had to actually bloody sit through on the other hand on Saturday was hardly one for the purist, that's for sure.

In a hard fought contest Manchester City won the first of what might be many trophies to come due to a solid defensive display and a scrappy goal from the imperious Yaya Toure. Oh God! How we could use a Yaya Toure right now! And to think that we could have had him years ago...

I hope that Arsene Wenger forces his team to watch the cup final footage over and over again because this final shows us all the cold hard reality of just what the Premier League in 2011 is all about. Aggression, athleticism and dogged defensive determination. It is not about a team full of dwarves passing it sideways for 90 minutes and clocking up meaningless statistics of vastly superior possession while curiously not gaining a proportional increase in our number of shots on target in comparison to our supposedly technically and tactically inferior opponents. Shots on target can now surely be the only real statistic that us Gooners can rely on to definitively determine the comparative competitive effectiveness of two football teams?

Stoke and Manchester City gave a masterclass in some of the tougher, harder and uglier aspects of the beautiful game, battling hard and contesting every ball. The challenges were flying thick and fast as we witnessed two teams playing tall, strong, athletic and hardworking players in a compact unit, utilising wide players (of varying degrees of talent) as their quick counter attacking outlet when the ball was won back. We witnessed set pieces that were both threatening and well worked albeit that the two sides did cancel each other out, due to the fact that they happen to be two very tall, aggressive teams. We witnessed players like Huth and Kompany practicing little moves that would have made Adams and Keown proud. The sneaky little fouls and shenanigans at set pieces or basically whenever the referee has his back turned might not be pretty to watch but are undoubtedly effective.

We witnessed everything that Arsenal simply no longer bother doing anymore and it might sound far fetched to some of you but we actually once had a back five to put even Manchester City's to shame.

Arsenal this season have been found out. They lack heart, passion and character and they have been found wanting defensively on numerous occasions and are constantly labelled as too lightweight and weak for the Premier League and our recent defeats against Bolton and Stoke would lend some weight to those claims.

I think it was David Moyes who referred to Man City as "The New York Knicks" due to their physical size and presence. In using David Moyes' analogy then, Stoke must be the L.A. Lakers, Chelsea must be the Chicago Bulls and Arsenal must be the equivalent of a Women's N.B.A. team, in terms of the height differential.

The whole of the Premier League except for Arsene Wenger seem to subscribe to the theory that you must have tall, physically strong, athletic players who can win games through determination and sheer Herculean effort alone, regardless of how well they are playing or what form they are in.

The arrival of Jack Wilshere into the Arsenal first team has given Arsenal fans a good opportunity to compare and contrast Denilson, Diaby and Jack Wilshere. We were all delighted to see how a very talented young lad can force his way into the Arsenal side due to sheer willpower and effort because those ahead of him were just not as aggressive, effective or hardworking as he is in central midfield. It's funny to see how Wilshere has improved more in a single year than Denilson and Diaby have in three years. Does that tell us anything about Wenger's coaching? I think it's probably due to Jack’s superior mental attitude and the testicular fortitude of the young Englishman more than anything else, to be honest.

We can only expect to see more of the same Stoke / Birmingham / Bolton tactics against us on most weekends from most opposition as more and more managers have cottoned on to the fact that this style of football is the most effective antidote to Arsenal's indirect passing game. How many more times will we see a side pack the midfield, drop deep, force us out wide and try and nick a goal from a counter attack or set piece against us? The answer is every week and Arsene Wenger needs to find a solution and he better do it fast.

Alex Ferguson has also figured out that this is the best way to play against Arsenal and this was shown to be the case when his Manchester United side full of second stringers knocked Wenger’s team out of the F.A. Cup back in March by using effective counter attacking football while Stoke and Bolton again exposed the lack of spirit, lack of determination and inability to defend from set pieces. Arsenal's strengths and weaknesses are there for all with eyes to see them again this year and because Wenger always insists on playing in the same way, other managers are finding it increasingly easy to prepare for a match against Arsenal.

If Arsene doesn't mix up his tactics for next season, I can see a situation where every team will try and use the same tactics against us therefore meaning that we could be facing more points dropped against supposedly technically inferior football teams.

Almost every single manager in the Premier League makes it a priority to sign the best goal keeper they can afford, the best centre half they can afford as well as the best defensive midfielder and the best target man that their money can buy. That is their job. Most managers understand that it is their job to oversee the most effective use of funds made available to them in order to get results on the football pitch. It only seems to be our Arsene that does not believe that it is important for him to buy the best players that he can afford, with all the money that he has available to him, along the spine of his team. He will instead make do with diabolical French centre halves, inadequate goalkeepers, mediocre midfielders and shot shy strikers. Arsene Wenger believes (or has been instructed) that it is his job to produce young players that he can then sell on for profit at a later date. He should instead be 100% concentrating on winning trophies for Arsenal F.C. and leave the business side of things to the suits upstairs.

Teams like Stoke and Birmingham made it to cup finals this year because, what they lack in technical ability, they more than compensate for in work rate, aggression, determination and excellent defensive coaching. By imitating Chelsea these sides are building from a solid goalkeeper and gritty defence, they are the direct antithesis of Arsene Wenger's Arsenal and we are starting to suffer because of it.

Arsene Wenger should watch the 2011 F.A. Cup Final over and over again and Remember how Arsenal once had the tallest, meanest, toughest and most athletic players in the premier league? And we were getting to Cup finals and winning titles then too.


NEW! Subscribe to our weekly Gooner Fanzine newsletter for all the latest news, views, and videos from the intelligent voice of Arsenal supporters since 1987.

Please note that we will not share your email address with any 3rd parties.


Article Rating

Leave a comment

Sign-in with your Online Gooner forum login to add your comment. If you do not have a login register here.

23
comments

  1. Ronster

    May 21, 2011, 8:26 #7274

    Joe....I'm praying that someone shoots Wenger and puts that deluded lunatic out of his misery! I'm sure you've read his latest press conference words of wisdom about not needing a fresh no2 and his ill judged and crass dig at the likes of Coventry.This fool is stripping the dignity and heritage of AFC piece by piece.

  2. Joe Fitzpatrick

    May 20, 2011, 19:34 #7270

    @Ronster- I meant that I'm praying that Nasri signs his contract!

  3. Joe Fitzpatrick

    May 20, 2011, 18:17 #7267

    @Ronster- even if I did win the argument, its a hollow victory. having to write about diabolical defending and shot shy strikers is pony. I'd much rather be writing about Aaron Ramsey, Theo Walcott and Master Jack tearing teams to shreds!!! That's why I do the odd mental/weird piece to try and lift the mood a bit for all the Gooners who can't find their Rose tinted specs. Praying that signs his ****ing contract!

  4. Ronster

    May 20, 2011, 12:46 #7253

    Joe...I think you'll find you've won this argument hands down in the eyes of most hard nosed Gooners!

  5. Joe Fitzpatrick

    May 20, 2011, 9:44 #7240

    David- I'm going to have to concede defeat on this one as i'm obviously never ever going to be able convince you that Arsenal's defence has been diabolical recently, the midfield has been mediocre recently and the attack has been shot shy recently... oh well! I guess beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder and I guess that I'm just not seeing what you are seeing.

  6. David

    May 20, 2011, 9:08 #7232

    Joe - Hangelaand is certainly an excellent player who could bring much needed aeriel dominance to Arsenal's defence. But your article was not about who was better Hangelaand or Squillachi, it was the assertion that "Arsenal's defence were diabolical, midfield mediocre & attack shot shy" - each of which (I believe) to be wholly unjustified and not supported by the factual matrix.

  7. Joe Fitzpatrick

    May 20, 2011, 6:27 #7226

    David- I think that the bottom line is that there are far too many individual errors from our back five. If it's not Almunia or Flappy, it's Clichy failing to clear the ball or playing everyone onside, Squillaci doing his usual, Koscielny getting sent off or Eboue bringing people down for penalties in the 98th minute. The point is, if one of them doesn't ruin everything then one of the other 3 will. If you wouldn't prefer to have got Hangelaand over squillaci or Koscielny then we will just have to agree to disagree on that one.

  8. CHGooner

    May 20, 2011, 1:32 #7225

    It is not about having tall, strong, skilful or intelligent players per se, it is about BALANCE. AW eschewed that principle long ago. He arrogantly felt that British/Irish players, tough players, loud players etc. were unnecesary. He erroneously thought that he could build a club diametrically opposed to all that had gone before would confirm his own legacy. Bull**** Wenger, total and utter bull**** and a disgrace to our great football club. So glad you've failed, you deserve to have done.

  9. Joe Fitzpatrick

    May 19, 2011, 22:14 #7218

    @Joe S- It looks like Man city will finish above us this year and they already have a better defence and goalkeeper than us! They've only conceded 33 goals to our 41. You are right they will spend big and they are gonna take some shifting from the top 4 now as they are still to fully gel as a unit completely. I'm glad you don't agree with me as this is a great place for fans from around the world to compare and share ideas.

  10. David

    May 19, 2011, 20:35 #7214

    Joe - Yes, Arsenal could tighten up like Fulham but that would be to the teams offensive detriment. Fulham's 47 goals to Arsenal's 70 this season reflects this and that's a big difference. You may use individual games as examples to support your case (Newcastle, WBA) and I can do the same (Man Utd, Man City) but the fact remains it is a 38 game season in which we have the fourth strongest defence in spite of our overtly offensive style of play. The facts prove Arsenal's defence is not diabolical. Finally, not scoring (nor conceding) any goals from outside the box at home does not in itself prove that a team which has scored 70 goals - the 3rd most in the league - are shot shy!

  11. Joe S

    May 19, 2011, 20:02 #7211

    Not a hundred percent with you on this one Joe. The FA cup final was a bloody aweful game and any better team than Stoke would have found Man. City's mercenaries out and really tested them. Yes, even Arsenal, although our one defnsive glich would nost probably have lost us the game. The consensis here in Australia was thar Man C have to keep buying big next season if they want to become a world class team.This is the worrying thing for Arsenal because of Wegner's obstinancy we will probably be consolidating again while every other major team are going to be getting stronger and picking up the best available talent.Rebuilding is OK though if it means cleaning out the dead wood and reconstructing a team with skill, professionalism and committment. Dream on.

  12. Joe Fitzpatrick

    May 19, 2011, 19:10 #7205

    @Richard Ansell- Thanks for the comments and you're right Alex Ferguson must be laughing his arse off right now. @CD- Good shout about Wenger not caring about what the opposition get up to!!!

  13. Ronster

    May 19, 2011, 17:39 #7201

    David (post7857)...the 4th tightest defence will with all probability equate to 4th place and having to play that money spinning two leg Champions League Qualifying tie.This is the sort of spin that Wenger hopes will keep the monkey off his back.Graham's back four shipped their fair share of goals,but remember they were kept far busier as the outfield players weren't as adept at keeping the ball, they invariably did however keep clean sheet after clean sheet in the games that really mattered.I'll give you one example why the current back four were unable to deliver the title this season....Arsenal seemingly comfortable away to Wigan,keeping possession and looking good for a vital away win.Wigan deliver one rare cross which overshoots the six yard box,Flappy a la Almunia goes chasing the ball instead of standing his ground,fails to gather it allowing a Wigan player to head it back across goal for a team mate to head into an empty net...BINGO...another two points down the drain!

  14. CD

    May 19, 2011, 17:36 #7200

    Answer to your question Joe re watching the FA Cup final is highly unlikely, because as Wenger himself always states he is only interested in how his team plays, and has never been remotely interested in the opposition. From his point of view you can see why, as he only has one tactic anyway so why bother to analyse the opposition as it's of no benefit to him, because regardless of what any other team does, he will still only use his one and only tactic. This is why, as you have already stated, every team now knows how to play against us because we are as predictable as night and day. Sadly that is what we are now paying £6.5 million a year for, which is a manager bereft of any other ideas, and worst of all to stubborn to change!

  15. Joe Fitzpatrick

    May 19, 2011, 16:51 #7197

    David- I see where you are coming from but having the same defensive record as Fulham this season simply isn't good enough for me and a lot of other fans anymore, especially when we have far more possession and territoral advantage than they do in almost every single game. Our defenders generally have much less to do than Fulham's defenders do so, yes, I would say that dropping a 4 goal lead against Newcastle, Going 3-0 down at home to West Brom and blowing a 2 goal lead over Tottenham (Home and away!) etc is indeed Diabolical and way off what our standards should be. As for the shot shy remark, I would like to point out that Ashburton Grove is the only premiership ground yet to see a goal scored from outside of the Penalty area by ANY TEAM this season. When you consider that we often get into excellent positions to shooooot! from outside the box and we fail to do so. Maybe it should be Shot shy midfielders as well? Just not good enough all round. I'm not happy with 4th but if you are... then i guess you are entitled to hold that opinion.

  16. Mark

    May 19, 2011, 16:21 #7196

    its that balance between skill and grit that i think others have got right more than we have. Man U for 1 with vidic/ferdi/VDS sold as a rock most days but with a clear plan that all their midfielders know how to defend as well as score. Man city appear to now be similar with De Jong/Barry providing great cover for what is already a good defence and great GK. Chelsea have a great GK and most of time defence is very strong. thats 3 teams on paper we are nowhere near if we stay as we are today. liverpool under kenny look to have a much better balance than before in that they are tough to breakdown but they have suarez who can take you apart from nothing.

  17. Theopants Superstar

    May 19, 2011, 15:24 #7194

    Johan, sorry mate but you've got that the wrong way around. Skill on it's own will only win you games occasionally. Whereas having some skill, the right tactics and players prepared to put the effort in will give you more consistency and gain you results much more often. Haven't the last few years taught you at least that much?

  18. David

    May 19, 2011, 15:01 #7192

    Joe - We have the 4th tightest defence and the 3rd most goals scored in the League. Would you agree that those facts somewhat undermine your assertion that we have a diabolical defence and shot shy attack? Whilst I agree that the Defence, Midfield & Attack are far from the greatest we've ever had at Arsenal, to describe them as "diabolical, mediocre & shot shy" respectively is extreme exaggeration which I very much doubt any reasonable minded, neutral person would concur with.

  19. Richard Ansell

    May 19, 2011, 13:58 #7191

    Johan - A team needs both skill AND GRIT to achieve continued success, that is the point Joe is making. Arsenal at the moment have bags of one and very little of the other.

  20. Northbanker

    May 19, 2011, 13:03 #7185

    Really nice article. especially,"It is not about a team full of dwarves passing it sideways for 90 minutes and clocking up meaningless statistics of vastly superior possession while curiously not gaining a proportional increase in our number of shots on target in comparison to our supposedly technically and tactically inferior opponents. Shots on target can now surely be the only real statistic that us Gooners can rely on to definitively determine the comparative competitive effectiveness of two football teams? " - That's absolutely spot on there! whats the point of 65% possesion and 62% territorial advantage if we dont't shoot? a lot of our opponents do end up having about as many shots ON target as us during the game, except they are usually more clinical than we are!

  21. johan

    May 19, 2011, 12:56 #7184

    the only way teams like birmingham, stoke and man city can win anything is with grit. the problem with that tactic is that it only works once in a while and completely lacks consistancy. teams like arsenal win with skill, which is the only consistent factor in football.

  22. Richard Ansell

    May 19, 2011, 12:40 #7182

    I always enjoy your articles Joe because you obviously feel exactly the same way as me (and many, many others) over the way Wenger has chosen (or been told) to run our club. Any fool should be able to see where the problems are with our current squad and tactics. How many more soft goals do we need to give away, how many more winning positions do we need to throw away before Wenger acknowledges that he needs to toughen things up and start signing the experienced, quality key 'spine of the team' players we are crying out for. My guess is that he is so stubborn he will continue on regardless or at best we may see one decent signing in the summer which on it's own will be like a sticking plaster over a gaping wound. It has now gone beyond a joke - nobodys laughing any more (apart from Fergie and the rest of the Premiership) as they look forward to mugging us again next year.

  23. Jekyll

    May 19, 2011, 11:18 #7174

    I think the FA cup final would convince Wenger to carry on as he is, because it was not aesthetically pleasing. Reports coming out that he's telling the board he wants 'one more year' to see his project through. Then summer 2012 it will be 'one more year'. Then summer 2013...