Bah Humbug

Two points dropped v Wolves



Bah Humbug

Stephen Hunt: Panto Villain


We’ve been here before haven’t we? Highly beatable opposition visit Arsenal. Three points expected. Just the one collected. Fatigue? Complacency? Lack of wit? In fairness, at times it reminded me a little of England v Poland in 1973. For those of a younger persuasion, England had to beat Poland at Wembley in a World Cup qualifier to make the trip to the following summer’s finals in West Germany. It finished 1-1 and the Polish keeper had a blinder as the attempts rained in on his goal. I saw a stat that Arsenal had 27 goal attempts over the duration of yesterday’s game. I’d guess at least half of them in the last 25 minutes.

The most frustrating thing was that the Gunners did the hard bit by taking the lead. 1-0 up at home should lead to consolidation of a winning position – by scoring more goals. Instead Arsenal were wasteful. Robin van Persie seemed a little selfish in a couple of situations, or at least believed a little too much in his own ability when there were better options available. Some might argue he’s earned that right, but it may have cost the team the win yesterday.

But the worst offender was Alex Song. Showboating with backheels with his side only a goal ahead, he had a poor game. The indiscipline that saw him receive a three match ban at the start of the season after the Newcastle game (the three matches he missed included the defeats to Liverpool at home and Man Utd away) reared its head again and he should have received a red card. That Stuart Attwell saw the incident where Song attempted to kick lumps out of two consecutive opponents and issued only a yellow means there will be no further disciplinary action. But the player needs to start maturing quickly if he is not to cost his team again. It was little wonder he was hauled off by the manager before much longer.

I was encouraged by the starting eleven, aside from the selection of Djourou who really struggles at right back. Aaron Ramsey has looked tired lately and I thought Rosicky had as decent a match as he is likely to given his sporadic appearances these days. Theo Walcott had a virus, so Yossi Benayoun was given a deserved start and both he and Rosicky were involved in the creation of the early goal.

The chances to increase the lead came and went, and then, Wolves got their leveler. I thought at the time that scorer Fletcher was offside, but later replays revealed the lacksadaisical Song strolling forward with the conviction that summed up his performance, playing the Wolves player onside.

Someone ventured to me that what the team lacked was pace, and with Walcott out and the Ox on the bench, there was surely an argument to see him thrown into the fray for the final 25 minutes. Instead we saw Ramsey, Arshavin and Chamakh, none of whom made much difference, although in fairness to the Russian, he had a go on this occasion.

Wolves did a decent job of eating up the clock, Stephen Hunt a wonderful panto villain on that score. I actually found the last half hour of the match pretty decent entertainment with the siege on the visitors’ goal and all the dramatics on the field. The Wolves sending off might not have been given were the game at Molyneux, but the reaction of the home crowd played its part in the dismissal of Milijas. As I understand it, if a player is deemed to have lost control of his movement when making this kind of tackle, a red will often result. In common parlance ‘don’t dive in’. The player’s feet may have been in contact with the ground but the studs were undoubtedly up and in this day and age, that’s a chance a player cannot take.

With ten man Wolves packing their own area, Arsenal were often reduced to pumping a high ball in and hoping something would drop their way. The visitors’ keeper Hennessey had a blinder and a late winner never arrived. Having made the start they did to the season, Arsene Wenger’s team can ill afford to drop cheap points. Fans were looking at 12 from 12 in the sequence of matches between Christams Day and Manchester United’s visit on 22nd January. Let’s now hope for 10.

The current issue of the Gooner is available to buy online here. It will also be on sale outside the forthcoming matches at home to QPR and Leeds.

Kevin Whitcher’s newly updated version of the book co-written with Alex Fynn, ‘Arsènal: The Making of a Modern Superclub’ is available in paperback from publishers Vision Sports for a reduced price of £6.99 including postage if you use the promo code ‘Gooner’ on the page that appears after you click ‘buy now’. Click here to order.


NEW! Subscribe to our weekly Gooner Fanzine newsletter for all the latest news, views, and videos from the intelligent voice of Arsenal supporters since 1987.

Please note that we will not share your email address with any 3rd parties.


Article Rating

Leave a comment

Sign-in with your Online Gooner forum login to add your comment. If you do not have a login register here.

48
comments

  1. Anna Mary

    Dec 30, 2011, 6:47 #16301

    Well it was reallt frustrating not to win against Wolves. But lets not forget this is only December. We have lots of games to improve. Hope for the best!

  2. Joe Fitzpatrick

    Dec 29, 2011, 21:40 #16298

    Excellent shout on Alex Song. I'm a bit reluctant to criticise him because of the lack of options in the squad behind him but, he was indeed guilty of showboating a bit and did indeed let the old red mist envelop him after a few nasty wolves challenges. Do you think another Defensive midfielder added to the squad would help push him on? Or does he just need more robust coaching?

  3. Canadagooner

    Dec 29, 2011, 17:37 #16290

    @Whinger_out_Now: i'm hoping you simply type up your comments out of frustration (and we all are) and you dont truly believe that the dynamics of how a football club operates and how players are signed is what you described in your comments above, as that would be truly worrying. those 'africans' (kanu etc) and 'french' (henry etc) are the ones who won us the trophies we sing about and most of them werent superstars till they came to arsenal and they left as mega-superstars. the 11 we fielded on tuesday should have been able to beat wolves and a majority of the teams in the premiership (with the exception of the top 6 teams who arguably have a crop of more expensive or better-performing players) - wolves and 14 of the 20 teams in the league would love to have the players we have. So, all the poetic stuff you typed up in your comment are simply bewildering. i dont care who bought the players we have, when we bought them, they must have showed some promise, and majority of them started out brightly. you can buy the world numbers 1 - 11 players and still have an under-performing team if all to tell them at the beginning of the season is that top 4 is great and there wont be any detriment if they fail to win any trophies. while at man utd, chelsea and now man city, their billioniare benefactors start the season by telling them what their objectives are and what they must win as a minimum, so you have a group of hungry players working hard through the season. liverpool bought and bought, and where are they now. arsenal have enough good players to beat wolves and others, but we dont have a matching ambition and will finish 4th again or out of the top 4. not beating birmingham in the carling cup final had NOTHING to do with the quality of the squad, just their ambition...

  4. Skooner

    Dec 29, 2011, 12:10 #16280

    Whilst it might not be ideal for fans to see the Ox as a savious from the bench, we did pay a lot of money for him and Chamakh & Arshavin have consistently failed to deliver so he was the best option when we were chasing the goal. Wengers substitutions always look premeditated and bear no relation to what is actually happening in the game. I wasn't surprised by the result, we didn't play well against Everton or Villa despite the wins, going forward no one is looking on form with perhaps the exception of Benayoun. I expect van Persie to be rested Saturday as the number of games he is playing is a massive risk with his record. A win is essential.

  5. Wombledin

    Dec 29, 2011, 9:35 #16274

    This is a squad that will only just do enough to finish 4th. When a squad hears their Manager say that a top four finish is as good as a trophy then psychologically 3rd or 4th is all they will aim for. 4th spot was in their reach, hence they mentally relaxed and bottled it against Wolves. Loads more games to get 4th spot so no use busting your balls now.

  6. Fozzy's mate

    Dec 29, 2011, 9:02 #16271

    Loving the back and forth between Canada and Harold. My problem as posted a thousand times is the wicked and unbelievable lack of ambition. All were here is Ivan the terrible parrotting self sustainable time and again and Hill wank (and his dire puffa jacket) saying everything is wonderful. Meanwhile OGL says we can't compete, why? We have bigger cash reserves than any club in world football but have taken a corporate decision note to use the massive resources at our disposal and make rich men even richer instead. All our rivals have bought individual players for fees well in excess of us and that includes the other lot from down the road. Good or bad acquisitions they demonstrate ambition. Under Graham and Wenger we reached the summit but quickly slipped back down, why? Because Hill Wank and co and now Kronke, Hill Wank and their supine mates at the board room table would rather trouser the profits than using them to. Strengthen the playing staff. They carefully picked and cultivated 2 instinctively frugal managers. I am afraid under this regime we are destined for 4-6th place each year and mediocrity accepted as the norm as it was in the mid 70s and 80s but without the cup runs we enjoyed as they risk valuable assets being injured and not being available to chase 4th place changrila. I do not totally absolve OGL as I think he enjoys a comfort zone in raking it in for his snivelling leaders and minimising expectations. I await another window where our rivals sign the players we actually want but can't bear to pay for followed by a summer of statements re RVP before the board sell him for a mediocre price and a smile and buy a second rate cheap replacement a 1159 on 31 August.

  7. Mike

    Dec 29, 2011, 7:50 #16270

    I watched the game on TV and thought the team should have played with more intensity in the first half - still don't think one or two additonal buys will solve the problems - just a comment on the atmosphere at the stadium as it came across on TV - for the first time this season there seemed to be a hostile environment for the opposing team at the stadium - would like to know how people at the game felt?

  8. Whinger_Out_NOW

    Dec 29, 2011, 3:14 #16269

    CanadaGooner, is the players are to blame then who is to blame for picking these players constantly? We'll see how many chances Clichy gets at Citeh. Here, he played constantly for 3 years despite his infamous regular cockups. Who is to blame for being indecisive in the summer transfer market and dithering over new purchases despite knoiwng that Cesc and Nasri are leaving? Who is to blame for sticking with tried and failed dross like Chamakh, Djourou, Diaby, Rosicky et all? Who's to blame for asinine statements like "if I buy so and so, it will kill Denilson", thereby effectively killing off competition for places. Who is to blame for inanely ineffective substitutions, irrespective of what the situation is demanding? Who is to blame for constant tactical naivety? Who is to blame for inability to drill a defense, nor the willingness to bring in an assistant who has this ability? Who is to blame for sifting through the sands of Africa and crud of France to bring in one after another 19 year old in the hope of uncovering one that could then be sold on for a big profit? Answers on a postage stamp please.

  9. Canadagooner

    Dec 28, 2011, 22:05 #16268

    @Harold: it's all too easy blaming the manager sir. there comes a time (and yesterday's game was it..) when the players need to do their bit, and they didnt. end of By the way, I'm a Londoner, just working here in Canada.

  10. Harold

    Dec 28, 2011, 20:28 #16267

    halfempty- Agree with what you say, I was more responding Canada Gooner's particular assertion that the players looked disinterested. I didn't agree with that, they just looked like they were playing the way the manager tells them to play, which often leads and will continue to lead to performances and results like yesterdays. And how Canada can post 4 times constantly slagging the team and not once directly blaming Wenger for anything is quite an achievement even for our North American friend.

  11. Canadagooner

    Dec 28, 2011, 19:05 #16266

    i'm still hopeful we'll make the top 4 but how many mistakes can we expect tottenham to make? and when they do, are arsenal going to capitalize or just drool along like we did yesterday? now, that's the question. I dont see chelsea finishing outside of the top 4 and like last season when arsenal fell to pieces following the carling cup debacle, chelsea will step it up sooner or later (or buy an entirely new team in january if they have to - money being no object to them...), so our realistic chance of making CL (Tottenham) are now potentially 8 points ahead of us with just 20 matches to go, and with our abysmal record against the top 6 teams, that really is an uphill task whichever way you look at it... still 100% support for the team and manager from me, and a lot of nail-biting coming up unfrotunately! real shame, as we could so easily have avoided this situation by setting our players some targets and getting them to see they need to deliver something!!! and not just cozy around, waiting for a top 4 finish

  12. halfempty

    Dec 28, 2011, 18:55 #16265

    harold: you miss the point. we should never have been in a position where we were frantically battering them for a winner for 25 mins. The manager should have ben sending them out to destroy the opposition and ease up when the job was done. instead we had a team meandering for 45 minutes, a goal ahead, cockily acting as if it was already done and dusted. Surely such a lowly club as Wolves werent going to prevent us from our rightful 3 points? That they did showed, for the umpteenth time, the lack of leadership and paucity of tactics both on and off the pitch. Top 4? Youre having a laugh!

  13. DW Thomas

    Dec 28, 2011, 18:46 #16264

    Can't believe this result. Yet for some reason I was not as pissed off as I usually am after a loss like this. Are we as fans to lower our expectations now? I think not. Wenger has made this bed andmust be held accountable come May and no trophies. 4th looks far off too. Man United shows intent and pounds Wigan. That is why they are champions...they win even when injuries say maybe they should struggle. Mental strength? How about just mental? Especially if Arsene thinks we can truly compete or win without quality additions and giving our players a kick up the rear for these slack performances. If Ramsey ups our tempo we really are a middle tier team. We need much more creativity than Song or Arteta can give. Sad day when Spurs play a better attacking style and win while we are stuck getting the same kinds of results year in year out. And yes I am tired of always being critical but we must see some change.

  14. Canadagooner

    Dec 28, 2011, 18:33 #16263

    @Harold, yes I saw the game. I am not commenting on an isolated situation: yesterday's draw wouldnt have mattered so much if we hadnt drawn fulham at home and dropped so many points at the beginning of the season (afterall our closet rivals largely dropped points over the xmas period too) - but from where we're at, we cant afford to be nonchalant. if you saw the game, you would have noted that after we went a goal up, the usual arsenal pattern set in (another commentator above has already talked about the showboating and lack of purposeful attack to increase that lead), and it wasnt until after wolves equalized that we stepped things up in the second half, but that is always a suicidal approach isnt it? as some of the struggling teams tend to hang on in such circumstances - it's not rocket science everyone's been talking about how Suarez has been hitting the bar and has been so unlucky, come summer, he wont get a medal for the number of times he hit the bar. football's about getting the ball in the net and being 100% interested throughout the match. Wenger isnt to blame for yesterday's debacle and i didnt imply anything of the kind, we just need our players to have an objective, a target, and it cant include the sort of display that leads to dropping 2 points given the early lead and opportunity we had to get up the table. FICKLE!!!!!

  15. Mark

    Dec 28, 2011, 17:31 #16262

    spurs will soon disappear over the horizon with the manch clubs and we will be left fighting it out against chelsea plus gary cahill and liverpool and we will come out 5th at best. if it was not for rvp we would not even be where we are now. all other clubs score from 4 or 5 sources but no we have created another player that we cannot do without (sound familiar ?) and we will be subject to a summer of speculation about him in 6 months time (sound familiar ?). but dont worry Thierry is back eventhough Meetsacker can now beat him over 100m

  16. Der Projekt ist Kaput

    Dec 28, 2011, 17:30 #16261

    Charlie D: Absolutely right. Our club has been in decline now for a good 5 years. In the desolate space between 2005 and 1930 at the Em****es, it ought to be written 'Project Wenger Years'. Sure, Abramovich mucked things up when he bought those trophies, but for us not to have used the available resources this great club possesses in order to stay ahead of Moan Utd and to compete against Chavski is unforgiveable. OK, the Manshyster City phenomenon has become the new Chavski - but Wenger and the Board have allowed Arsenal to slip so far down the Premiership pecking order that even finishing fourth is looking decidely dicey. What the hell is happening to our club?

  17. JCL

    Dec 28, 2011, 17:15 #16260

    The point about yesterday was that exactly the same thing has happened regularly at home since 2006, and in my opinion it will keep happening under Wenger.Nothing will change, and we will not take the step up to the next level. It was crying out for Oxlade Chamberlain in the last 15 minutes yesterday. Gervinho had loads of possession and did very little with it. Chamberlain showed against Man City in the Carling Cup that he is capable of a moment or two of magic and can put in a very good cross. His entrance would have also lifted the whole stadium. Also, of course, we had no quality striker on the bench to come on and make a difference.

  18. Charlie D

    Dec 28, 2011, 16:16 #16259

    Predictable.We got away with being sloppy at Villa Park but not twice in a week.Wenger teams of the last few years cant handle pressure.Its amazing that his favourite saying is "Mental Strength" which is what we dont have.We have only beaten one of the top 7 teams.The substitutions were a joke as usual.If the Ox is as good as we all think he is then he has to come on at home to Wolves before the rubbish Chamakh and Arshavin.Chamakh has scored 1 league goal in a year he makes Bendtner look prolific.To make matters worse the Spuds are playing the type of football we used to. quick and fast moving unlike our timid tippy tappy ponderous square passing.Wenger's failure to buy quality in the summer will cost us 4th place and that should cost him his job but it wont.The club is in decline

  19. Tookland

    Dec 28, 2011, 15:25 #16258

    Wolves at home - gotta be three points if we were even to compete for 4th. But that was the moment we jumped the shark this season. We are flailing in the wake of Spurs, the tables completely turned in that regard. Chelsea's directors will not allow them to miss out on the CL while our 'directors' don't give a toss about the club. Please Wenger prove me wrong and sign a couple of diamonds in January - otherwise it's a decade out in the cold. Nice stadium though.

  20. Harold

    Dec 28, 2011, 15:12 #16257

    Canada Gooner- If players appear disinterested then they're obviously not playing for the manager, who always bears the ultimate responsibility. But regarding yesterday, did you actually see the game? Although I'm not Wenger's biggest fan I thought the team worked hard and were very unlucky not to run out easy winners. You should pick your games to be controversial more carefully.

  21. Canadagooner

    Dec 28, 2011, 14:36 #16256

    surely the players we currently have should be good enough to have beaten b'ham in the carling cup final and wolves yesterday. so, no it's not about buying this player or that player, it's about asking the players we currently have, what on earth they're being paid for?????? the thinness of our squad or indeed the need for additional quality in certain areas should only be an issue for us when we play city, utd, chelsea or spurs. when playing any of the other teams in the premiership our current squad is good enough (or should be), but they just appear disinterested!

  22. HowardL

    Dec 28, 2011, 14:12 #16255

    Strangely I too was reminded of that CSKA game, but more thinking how Rosicky was never quite the same player again after missing that open goal.

  23. maguiresbridge gooner

    Dec 28, 2011, 14:04 #16254

    Your right ed with the equalizer we new what was coming but it was up to us to break them down we couldn't.Liverpool and chelsea dropping points for fun even city dropping points the chance to go fourth at home to wolves but no we balls it up whats new ? We all know the prem league has been over for us for quite a while but when the chance presents itself to gain ground on the top four no we don't take it or can't it whatever your preference.Like a lot of fans on here i'm not happy with scrapping for third or fourth but hey thats the position we find ourselves in so lets make the best of it but we can't even do that. No doubt we will hear all the usual excuses from all sides but one thing's for sure this should have been three points and if players aren't up to it buy some who are.

  24. Canadagooner

    Dec 28, 2011, 13:56 #16253

    a truly disastrous result and only one word for that display: FICKLE! this is one game where we really have to examine the character of our players (none exempt) - it's a little surprising that some now see ox as a potential saviour? i dont. if after spending however much we've spent and pay what we pay in wages, we now have to rely on a teenager coming good, then something is very wrong at the club. The fact of the matter is, we have a bunch of players with no goals nor objectives for the season - they simply drift along from game to game and i'm not too sure if we can blame them too much, if the club itself shows a stack lack of ambition to do any better than finish in the top 4. less than halfway into the season we have already given up the chase for the title, when the attitude should be to fight till it's mathematically impossible for us to win it, and then and only then, should we begin looking at finishing in the top 4. unfortunately, the reverse is the case: we start off the season moaning about how much money other clubs have spent and how a top 4 finish would be a bonus and must be appreciated. So, we have a bunch of players who think a draw at home against wolves isnt such a bad result - forgetting they had dropped several points at the beginning of the season to the likes of blackburn! any 11 put out by arsenal yesterday should be capable of beating wolves at home - only have to look at man utd's injury-ravaged side and the spate of 5 - 0 results they continue to achieve with second string or fringe players - that's because Fergie has now set them a target they dare not fail to achieve following their exit from the champions league and the entire team are aware of this target. i would like to see a few arsenal players come out and tell us what their targets are for this season and for each season so we know where their mind's at. we cant look past the players when results like this occur. very FICKLE performance indeed! hope they improve against QPR.

  25. Michael Preston

    Dec 28, 2011, 13:28 #16252

    The game reminded me of the one against CSKA, in 2006 I think, where we murdered them 0-0.

  26. divingrooney

    Dec 28, 2011, 13:01 #16250

    You are saying Ramsey had no effect on the game. Ridiculously blind fella, he put through RVP on goal. Hit a few amazing crosses, and overall increased the tempo that led to string of saves. He was the reason, Arsenal feel unlucky, else for 65 min before, I don't think we created that many chances to be aggrieved with the draw...

  27. Ron

    Dec 28, 2011, 13:00 #16249

    Van Persie certainly played with his emphasis being on that worthless 'calender year record' rather than for the greater good of the team. It shows hes still a bit immature. He thought Wolves were fodder for him. They were far from it and both he and we suffered. He was quite average in his efforts to be honest, apart from the free kick later on that saw another great save from the keeper. The game highligted the lack of quality in the squad. They all worked hard, yes even Arshavin, but it wasnt all the ref and it being 'one of thoe days' to blame. It was there to be won and Arsenal were far from good enough, creative enough or imaginitive enough. Onwards though. We didnt lose and theres half a season plus Cups left to play for yet. PS That was game where chancing a half hour with the Oxlade C was worth a punt, esp as Rosicky (who played very well) tired badly in the last 20 mins.Couldnt see the point in Ramsey getting on.

  28. IMAC

    Dec 28, 2011, 12:56 #16248

    After Wolves scored I can't remember Chesney having a save to make which just shows how important a clean sheet can be to attaining 3 points. We don't keep enough of them. The 2nd half was something we've seen many times since 2006. Plenty of possession but all too predictable in the final third with the opposition getting numbers behind the ball. We then lack ideas and a cutting edge and subsequently no goal. I know Hennessy was very good but Arsenal's finishing could have been better as the efforts were too close to the keeper. In addition Wenger's subs weren't great but the decision to bring Song off was the right one.

  29. Gee

    Dec 28, 2011, 12:55 #16247

    Love the way Wenger has got fans baying for the Ox to make an appearance. Absolutely hilarious that the editor is also one of this crew. Hoping an 18 year old who has barely played premier league football will somehow rescue a dire season is short sighted to say the least. The Ox needs time to bed in he should not be under immense pressure to save the day at this early stage. He should be coming on when we're 3 up and running rings round a tired opponent and bagging a cheap goal to make it 4 or 5 nil. Not being chucked on in desperation at 1-1. We are still a very average side with one or two decent players. No game winners at all on the bench, means VP has to virtually do everything himself. Again the team do not defend as a unit and again we concede the softest of soft goals, from one of there only shots of the game. We are still weak and in desperate need of investment. £50m in the bank is not helping us to get 4th. On that note this chase for 4th is reminiscent of the last 2 years title challenge (if you can call it that). I don't think we ever really got to outright 1st at any point during the last 2 years yet we always felt we could, if we only can capitalise on the errors of the teams above us. We were always hanging onto the coat tails of 1st rather than actually defending 1st position in the table. I thin this year is much of the same. We're so close to Chelsea and 4th but we've yet to be in it and so this will be set to continue. Spurs are almost completely out of sight now...

  30. SilverGooner

    Oct 27, 2011, 18:15 #14562

    Whatever the reason, Chamakh is woefully out of form, and has been for some time now. He is currently no use whatsover to the first team. Wenger should play him in the reserves for a few games, not as punishment but to bag himself some goals and play himself into some kind of form. Give Park a run in the first team instead - he must be more use than Chamakh.

  31. Jamesdoddts

    Oct 27, 2011, 17:42 #14560

    Personally not finding myself agreeing with this. Chamakh's role is simple: Stick the ball on his head and 8/10 chances will go in. Stick the ball into his feet and not a lot will happen. He isnt the best finisher in the world with his feet and isnt a 'fox in the box' style striker. For me, he is most effective when he is in the box feeding off of crosses that are flung in from out wide and not when he is playing on the shoulder of the last man as he isnt the quickest/trickiest forward we have. Don't get me wrong, I like Chamakh and i think he is good for the squad and a good choice to bring on when we need a goal if we are bombarding the opposition defence but for me, the style that Park brings makes him more of a goal threat and therefore (if he continues to settle well)would be the natural replacement for RvP. Also Chamakh is off to the Africa Cup of Nations in January so Park will undoubtedly get his chacne then!

  32. allybear

    Oct 27, 2011, 16:53 #14558

    Didnt see the game but i believe Park was very good and i hope he is given a chance.As to players not playing their natural positions well Wenger only allows HIS way of playing.Personally i think Chamakh is excellent in the air and would benefit from good crosses which he wont get from Walcott. Hope TV is back for Chelsea game.

  33. Ron

    Oct 27, 2011, 16:32 #14557

    Cham . Sadly, not good enough. Hes weak. Its not lack of confidence at all. No shame in it. Hes just not cut out for the rigours of the Prem League. Many players arent.

  34. The Happening

    Oct 27, 2011, 14:30 #14556

    Chamakh is a classy striker, always has been! Amazing performances in his last season in France and also playing for his national team, you're right on his credentials! Have to agree, he is quite simply played out of position, as was Bendtner, as is Arshavin! We could get alot more out of so many plaers if the tactics were not as rigid, pin point article Simon!

  35. DW Thomas

    Oct 27, 2011, 2:11 #14547

    Totally agree! Chamakh is not as bad at all as people have been saying. He has some very good qualities, but looks low on confidence for whatever reason(s). We never give him his due crosses. He seems to get maybe one or two each game he plays and usually has a scoring chance. RVP is definitely the better striker, but Chamakh needs more minutes to get his mojo back. One of the most beautiful things in football is seeing a great cross whipped in and a finish of sublime skill with the head. It might be more difficult than a 10 pass tippy-tappy goal. Chamakh is always capable of this and has been left hung out to dry a little at times by our wingers and wing backs. I say get rid of Bendtner and keep Chamakh and Park. At least they are more humble and down to earth and seem to value the club and team over personal gains. I know you need confidence as a pro footballer, but Bendtner is way too overhyped by many fans. The same fans I think who criticized him for his lack of goals and bad misses. If we are truly to compete again, we must get better players and our current group to perform to their peak. That is a top goal, or should be, of any manager at any level. Wenger, if nothing else, has been found wanting in his ability to find the right players and get them to their peak. Or if they peak, then they leave for any number of reasons justified or not. He needs to be more truthful about his players and their "mental strength" which has been lacking for years now.

  36. jambo

    Oct 26, 2011, 23:03 #14545

    exiled&dangerous, seriously, you want walcott on the left? any half decent right back will just show him the line and if you think theo's crossing is bad now - imagine it on his left peg? fact is theo needs to be put through the middle if he is to realise his potential!

  37. Theo's Make-Up Pencil

    Oct 26, 2011, 21:03 #14544

    How can a player be 'short of confidence' for a whole year? If someone's mentally can be that 'fragile' surely they have no place being at a big club like Arsenal, where pressure comes with the territory? It's looking more and more to me like it's the start Chamakh made to his Arsenal career that was the abberration, not his subsequent form. Much as I'd like to see him succeed, I think Chamakh has had more than enough chances and I for one would rather Park was given an opportunity to show his worth.

  38. exiled&dangerous

    Oct 26, 2011, 20:25 #14543

    And on the subject of players who would probably perform better in a different position, Walcott on the left side perhaps, using his pace to cut inside and shoot, as it's becoming a bit painful watching him waste crosses from the right? Obviously, only when Gervinho isn't doing it..... oh what would I know, I played in goal all my life......

  39. mark from aylesbury

    Oct 26, 2011, 20:17 #14542

    Chamakh is horribly short of confidence. Not sure how you cure this sometimes a return back home is the only answer. Have to say my impression of Korean players is very favourable, hardworking high tempo Park sounds like a decent honest player. Boy do we need honest grit

  40. north bank

    Oct 26, 2011, 17:40 #14540

    chamakh is toilet.End of discussion

  41. Gooner87

    Oct 26, 2011, 16:38 #14539

    Sorry I would have to disagree with your assessement of Chamakh. The problem that bloggers such as yourselves have is that you take an overall view and then make definitive assumptions. Arsenal play the arsenal way full stop. The problem with Chamakh is that he has accepted his position as not being better than Van Persie, when he was playing last season he was the only striker, the minute competition came he dwindled. Unfortunately for us he does not show that he has the desire to be better than Van Persie or to up his level now he is fully fit, he has accepted he is 2nd/3rd best and Wenger has stated similar....not good enough. Everyone knows at United that on paper Rooney is the best player but you can tell from the performances of the other strikers when given a chance that they have the hunger, belief, desire, confidence and mental strength to proof that they may not be as glamorous or all encompassing ala Rooney or Van Persie, but their goal scoring numbers will still stack up. That to me is why I think Chamakh has been poor and personally this type of player is the very epitomy of weak mental strength within the club (things are not going you way and you do nothing to change it apart from saying you will in post match interviews). We comment on his heading ability which is apparent but more often that not he is heading straight at the goal keeper.

  42. Mike

    Oct 26, 2011, 15:33 #14538

    Sort of disagree with all that is written about Chamakh at the moment. He proved that he could score goals at the beginning of last season scoring a goal every second match or so, in the absence of van Persie. When Van returned and hit his rich vein of form which has continued into this season, Chamakh has been a part time player. I don't think he is much of an impact player to come on as a sub, and I think he is a player that needs to play entire games regularly before he starts scoring. Whilst Rvp is playing like he is - Camakh will continue to watch from the side (rightly so) and come on for 20 minute cameos without much effect.However, if RVP becomes injured and Chamakh gets a run, I am sure he will get his fair return. He has proved it before. As for 20 minute cameo's at the moment, Park is the better option

  43. maguiresbridge gooner

    Oct 26, 2011, 15:31 #14537

    agree completely simon can,t understand why players are signed then played out of position.

  44. Passcloud

    Oct 26, 2011, 14:30 #14534

    This is naive. Park scores in CC and all of a sudden he is a king. This attitude against Chamakh is unwarranted and can only destroy Chamakh contribution to Arsenal. I hope he can move on to a better place away from these ethnocentric critics - or else support your team!

  45. Matty S

    Oct 26, 2011, 13:10 #14532

    Agre. Fantastic article, and a rare objective piece in a world full of doom and gloom. Having said that, Chamakh (and Bendtner if her returns) must learn to expand their repetoire.

  46. Gee

    Oct 26, 2011, 12:39 #14530

    Disagree with this. we've played the same style for 3 years and asked the lone striker to do the same thing for the same 3 years. we did not play any differently when Chamakh was scoring and getting involved with play in terms of linking with his team mates. He is the one that has changed. His touch and presence are so so timid. and that's viewing it from the stands. Lord knows what the defences he's up against are thinking! We've never really played an aerial type game of booming crosses in for him. Granted he's nodded a few in, but our preference of this style has not changed sinc he arrived. The bloke needs to show some strength and desire that was on display in his first 4 months at the club

  47. Jekyll

    Oct 26, 2011, 12:05 #14529

    You are correct but it is evident that Wenger doesn't play to the strengths of the players he has. That would be too flexible for him. He has his 'vision', his set formation and will persist with that no matter what happens. Performances or results do not impact on this 'vision'.

  48. Unbeaten 03/04

    Oct 26, 2011, 11:21 #14525

    You got this Chamakh article spot on!!!!