Mesut the Wizard of Oz: the cherry without the cake?

Objectively decrypting Arsenal’s summer business



Mesut the Wizard of Oz: the cherry without the cake?


First off, the deadline-day signing of Mesut Özil was the sort of thing us Gooners have pined for for years and years. The sort of thing that would have us drooling jealously as our rivals up and down the country would secure name after name, talent after talent, in years bygone, whilst we contented ourselves with a mixture of acquisitions ranging from the merely capable to the utterly contentious.

Well, it was our rivals who were left drooling this time, and Özil’s signing has been mooted as a potential turning point in the history of Arsenal Football Club, and indeed Arsène Wenger. And rightly so.

Whilst many naysayers and doom-mongers had brazenly suggested that he was not the sort of signing we needed (and I will indeed come onto who and what else was a dire necessity), I simply do not buy into such an argument. Such sceptics are the same people who will have once cried out at the Club’s stagnating stench of ambitionless squalor. In my mind, a team with ambition is a team striving for the very best quality. Also in my mind, is that any team with ambition needs a man of the ilk and silk that has catapulted him into European football’s most gifted true playmaker over the past five years, and with his best years still ahead of him. Mesut Özil is such a man.

But enough of the little wizard for now.

Once the furore of “Mesut mania” had died down after the clock struck eleven on Monday last week - a good few days later, admittedly, and with the full squad list out in full force - it is clear to see that, whilst comprehensive enough, it is a list with one or two glaringly unfilled gaps yet to be. Not millions, as some will have you believe, but one or two.

Despite an impressive shut-out in the North London derby, Wojciech Szczesny has more than met his match in the loan arrival of Emiliano Viviano from Palermo. A relatively unknown quantity here, but highly rated in Italian and European circles nevertheless.

Mathieu Flamini showed his potential worth with a solid substitute re-debut in the same match, and may yet be one of Wenger’s best pieces of business in recent years, given our desperate need for a holding midfield player. Meanwhile, up front, another freebie in Yaya Sanogo has added depth and much-needed power and aerial prowess. Again, although relatively unknown, a talented product from France’s famous Clairefontaine Academy, he is sure to play an important role as the season progresses.

Yes, there was a massive cock-up involving the botched signings of Gonzalo Higuain and Luis Suarez, and yes, it seems that the Club had tried, and were willing to put their money where their mouths were.

Sadly, trying alone may not be enough, and when your main striker states the need for a suitable partner/cover, you just know that it cannot be all under control. Wenger was clearly keen to add a world-class name, yet the Club failed with no real explanation as to how and why.

Over to the defence, and another gap resurfaces. With Thomas Vermaelen out and having dipped in form drastically over the last year, we are one injury/suspension away from trouble. Per Mertesacker and Laurent Koscielny have formed an impressive unit in the centre of the defence, but a further addition was needed. And yet, despite being linked to several, including Ashley Williams and Toby Alderweireld, nothing materialised and we are left with a situation of huge risk. Equally as risky is the sole reliance in the centre of defence on the versatility of Bacary Sagna, who, although useful, is not a cause for confidence come the biggest of clashes.

Nevertheless, we have been active in the market, with the last laugh for Wenger’s coup in convincing Mesut Özil that his future lies at Arsenal.

And whilst I have no doubts about his ability to light up the Premier League, it is equally important to realise that we are still thin on the ground, and that further additions may be considered come January.

So, all in all, a less than satisfactory summer has been dramatically upgraded, thanks to Özil. It remains to be seen how the team dynamic changes, and whether we may beg Arsène to delve into his kitty once again in the winter.

For now, however, Mesut Özil is the hero of the hour, and who knows, maybe the catalyst for a glory-laden season.


NEW! Subscribe to our weekly Gooner Fanzine newsletter for all the latest news, views, and videos from the intelligent voice of Arsenal supporters since 1987.

Please note that we will not share your email address with any 3rd parties.


Article Rating

Leave a comment

Sign-in with your Online Gooner forum login to add your comment. If you do not have a login register here.

36
comments

  1. Aabbs7

    Sep 12, 2013, 23:30 #39168

    Ozil will not win us the league single handed people. However he is a great player, and he will give us another dimension. More importantly, it now sends out the message to other world class players Arsenal is the place to come. What striker wouldn't like to play with Ozil? If we stay within reach of top spot with our current team, then go and splash out big on a world class striker, and a defensive midfielder. Then u never know. Jans a hard time to make big signings tho, so I hope the board r feeling out some players now.

  2. good old jens

    Sep 12, 2013, 4:08 #39144

    viviano is not rated highly in italian circles, he was woeful for fiorentina last season hence why they didnt take up their option to buy him. Don't just throw out any nonsense opinion that backs up your point and hope no one realises its bull.

  3. Chris

    Sep 11, 2013, 10:39 #39116

    SGRB - Yes there is a bit of a contradiction but that's because there's a difference between what I'd do (I would have invested what we could to have tried to keep Fab & RVP and certainly replace them immediately) and what I realistically think Arsenal will do (they didn't even do what I just described, preferring to invest later, let alone 'borrow form the future'). I think the full amount of transfer revenue & expenditure will be offset against the accounts immediately, so if income has exceeded expenditure, as you point out, we will actually be 'physically' in deficit compared to what the accounts show, won't we? Either way, the bottom line is we all agree there was more money to spend window and should be even more in the next one and one after. Would have liked more of it to be spent by now but let's hope we see some more top signings in the next two windows (better late than never!).

  4. Stroud Green Road Boy

    Sep 10, 2013, 19:46 #39104

    "The two balance each other out approximately" This would be true if AFC had not been bringing a lot more in transfer fees than paying out for many years now. As for 'being realistic', you seem to be arguing against a point you made in post 41919 - at least you seemed to be alluding to the notion of speculate to accumulate there. This was the money for this window. More is being generated all the time.

  5. Chris

    Sep 10, 2013, 19:34 #39103

    SGRB - actually, that is 'how it works'. As I said, just as we stagger our payment to other clubs, so they do theirs to us. The two balance each other out approximately. If you really think a club like Arsenal is going to spend future tranfer funds now, you aren't being very realistic... As for this window, I'm sure everyone agrees we could, theoretically, have spent/done more - I know I was expecting a bit more. But for various reasons, things don't always work out. I agree that ultimately the manager is responsible for that.

  6. Stroud Green Road Boy

    Sep 10, 2013, 18:58 #39101

    Canterbury - indeed, I was simply using the £70m figure plus the extra from the sales of Gervinho and Mannone to demonstrate that both Higuain and Ozil could have been bought, up front (which as Ron says, isn't even how it works)even when you're erring on the conservative side of estimating available transfer spend. I think it's perfectly clear that Wenger could have done a lot more this summer had he chosen to and/or had the ability to. For all the novel glamour of the Ozil signing familiar holes in the squad remain, and we have recent historical precedence to suggest how our seasons pan out in this situation.

  7. Chris

    Sep 10, 2013, 17:47 #39100

    Green Hut - the accounts show cash reserves, not the allocation of those reserves for specific purposes (should they be available for any). Ron - I appreciate that (transfer fees being staged) but I imagine that the full amount committed to is offset immediately, especially as payments to us form other clubs are also staged (the two balancing out over all). I agree the increased commercial revenue resulting from a transfer should be taken into account - as well as the potential increased sporting revenue resulting from hoped-for additional sporting success. The latter in particular is something Arsenal don't appear to have borne in mind much recently... On the other hand, 4th or 5th biggest revenue in Europe doesn't necessarily equate to having the 4th or 5th largest amount of cash to burn.

  8. Green Hut

    Sep 10, 2013, 17:34 #39099

    Chris- Wenger will always use the vague and the ambiguous to try and mask his shortcomings, but thankfully we have the club accounts and the clear, financially supportive statements from a succession of directors to unmuddy the waters.

  9. Chris

    Sep 10, 2013, 17:30 #39098

    SGRB / Green Hut - yes you are right - I should have added in the Gervinho money (and read your posts properly before replying 2nd time to Green Hut). So £76m is about right post-Gervinho (isn't £6m what we got for him?), so £33.6m left, which would have been enough for Higuain....

  10. Canterbury Gooner

    Sep 10, 2013, 17:13 #39097

    SGRB- don't forget also that the £70m estimate was made before the revenue of Queensland road and some other property sales which is projected to be worth £20-30m, which is why estimates tended to be labelled as "£70-100m" (or £80-110m after the sales of Gervinho and Mannone).

  11. Chris

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:48 #39096

    Green Hut - you might think that, and you might be right, but as I said, this has been discussed ad nauseum already and no one really knows. Wenger said in January that the new deals etc meant for the first time that 'substantial' money was available to him for the first time. Maybe he was lying, maybe not....

  12. johnny lynch

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:41 #39095

    What do you think is going to happen when Ozil is splitting open defences with pinpoint accuracy only for Bendtner to put them into Row Z ?? How long do you think this world class player is going to hang around ?? Utterly delusional article

  13. Green Hut

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:37 #39094

    Chris- The £70m figure has been oft-reported for at least a year, long before the new TV deal, new club sponsorship deals and the sale of Gervinho. Wenger has spent £35.4m net in this transfer window. I thought I was being conservative with £80m.

  14. Stroud Green Road Boy

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:34 #39093

    @Chris, the oft reported figure of £70m was at the start of the summer. A further £10m was raised through sales, principally of Gervinho and Mannone. So if we're going with this figure, we then have £80m pre-Ozil. So as well as Ozil, Higuain could have been bought even with the price hike. This is without taking into account the amount of money taken off the wage bill by letting so many players go (albeit some of them had to be paid off).

  15. Ron

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:31 #39092

    Chris - Transfer fees are rarely (if ever) paid up front. Theyre always staged payments.Moreover, that reported cash sum was just available funds and ignores commercial revenue both existent and projected which signing a top player brings with it. Arsenal have been able to buy such players for at least 4 years. You ought not fall for the ' we re hard up line' theyve peddled ad fed you with for so long. Theyve been the 4th or 5th richest European Club for some years now. The games up for the parsimony ticket theyve done to death for ages and some of those Board members will have to step up and so will Wenger. Theyve nowhere to hide now. What will happen is that now that stadium is more or less paid for, they ll head for the hills after selling up. Kroenke wont be there for long. The Clubs value will escalate like crazy shortly what with debts discharged and the economy on the move. Watch them kill each other in the rush to sell up as the share value heads northwards. Usmanov and his crew are next up and Wenger will likely walk when they do. Any new contract he signs will to a great degree rest upon the status quo remaining in place there and as such he ll have a clutch of escape options built into it.

  16. maguiresbridge gooner

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:29 #39091

    Ozil is certainly the kind of player we've been pining for for years but it wouldn't have done us much good as any top players we had that were capable of playing along side him were being sold. The gaps just haven't resurfaced they've been there for years and one real top top class signing after all the other rubbish over the years isn't going to plug them, and neither is the loan of an unknown first or second division keeper from Italy no matter how highly rated he is we have enough of them here already still waiting on them to prove themselves. We've certainly upgraded with Ozil alright and in a big way, and lets hope further up grades are more than just considered, because they're definitely needed and we've got the taste for class now, and going back to down grading again will not get us where we want to go, we've been doing that and going nowhere for long enough.

  17. Chris

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:14 #39090

    Green Hut - the total amount of money available to Wenger is unknown, as has been discussed ad nauseum. However, if we take the oft-reported figure of £70m, the amount remaining after the other transfers (total: £43.4m) would be £26.6m - not enough to sign Suarez or, after the price hike, Higuain.

  18. Man United Killer

    Sep 10, 2013, 16:11 #39089

    Good job on a well balanced article.I agree with a majority of the things you say except for the arguements leading to the comment "Such sceptics are the same people who will have once cried out at the Club’s stagnating stench of ambitionless squalor". I think almost everyone agrees with the fact that Ozil is a great player and will definitely improve the team.Afterall 54% of Ronaldo's goals were assited by him.The point is buying 'world class' tyres when you need a 'standard' water pump wont stop your car from overheating.

  19. johnnyhawleyloovinggooner

    Sep 10, 2013, 14:49 #39087

    had a chelsea fan ,a west ham fan and a manu fan in with me at work. they are betting men .none are so sure we will end up potless this year as they were before ozil.

  20. Ron

    Sep 10, 2013, 14:02 #39086

    Top player, top signing. To say otherwise would be stupid. Pity its the type of signing the Club should have been signing 6 years back before it engaged in throwing massive money like confetti at your Denny's, Bendtner's and Djourou's plus other lead legged rubbish while watching and/or even forcing out players we should have kept.

  21. Bard

    Sep 10, 2013, 13:59 #39084

    Gooner Ron I agree he 's stubborn but he promised a top signing and by the last day of the window he still hadn't bought anyone. why did he make such a fuss of buying a striker and then end up buying Ozil. He's not stupid and would be aware of the fans discontent.

  22. Green Hut

    Sep 10, 2013, 13:23 #39082

    I agree Ozil wasn't bought to appease the fans, I'm sure Wenger was very happy to spend £40m+ on one player if it meant he was able to leave the other £40m sitting in the bank gathering dust. Well, apart from the £0.9m he spent on our three other new signings. And with Sagna filling in at centre-back and the possibility of Marica (a striker according to his agent, but one with a shocking scoring record for all his clubs) coming in from Schalke on yet another free, Wenger will believe he has all bases covered. He said last year that he had his best squad ever, can't wait to hear what he says about this one. Arsene really knows...how to fool most of the people most of the time.

  23. Benny2

    Sep 10, 2013, 13:16 #39081

    Surprisingly, we have as many defenders as Chelsea: Jenkinson, Sagna, Mertesacker, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Gibbs, Monreal. To Chelsea's Azpilicueta, Ivanovi, Luiz, Cahill, Terry, Cole, Bertrand. We have Flamini as well that can play Right or Left back. As I've said before what top centre back will want to come to Arsenal to be fourth choice? Just because we have injuries doesn't mean we should buy new people (Unless a player is out for longer that 6 months) because you'd end up with about 40 players. A think we need a young CB though like Miquel who won't mind the bench and under-21's but in a couple of years will be good enough to play every week.

  24. BADARSE

    Sep 10, 2013, 11:59 #39080

    I just want to nail one misconception, Mesut Ozil was not bought to appease the fans. Such power and influence coming from the lower ranks? Don't make me laugh! Big organisations rarely listen to the people at the bottom. If, and when they do, it is a token gesture, or there is a serious rebellion taking place. Not so at AFC, I am afraid to announce, despite many wishing their voices had been heard. Sometimes it can make a difference though, so raising a clamour always has a likely benefit. If AFC wanted to apply a palliative consideration it would not have been a £45 million, touch. If that was indeed the sop, why not spend another £10 million on A.N.Other striker? Then £55 million gets you virtually exonerated. Whatever the causes, Ozil, was a consideration, and I for one am thankful that the cookie crumbled that way.

  25. CanadaGooner

    Sep 10, 2013, 11:52 #39079

    phew! AmericanGoonerFan, please consider sending in an article instead of your 200 line comment above; I pity your sore fingers matey.

  26. GoonerRon

    Sep 10, 2013, 11:31 #39078

    @ Bard - you say Ozil was signed as a sop to the fans but this contradicts the view of many on here. (a) Wenger is so stubborn he will never listen to anyone else, so why suddenly try to appease fans with this signing? (b) He will never spend big money on top players, so why change now?(c) He runs the club from top to bottom so even if he was under pressure from the board there is no reason to suggest he would want to/need to cave in.

  27. BADARSE

    Sep 10, 2013, 11:14 #39076

    Thank you Asser, enjoyed this one! @AmericanGunnerFan, thank you too, an article,within an article, no less. The points you made sit very comfortably with me. Whilst endorsing your overall view, I too cast a tired eye over transfer proceedings. However the key word you mentioned, which all need to absorb, is squad 'versatility'! This must have been the back stop position of the backroom boys, it would have been mine. Priorities fade a little when other facets are allowed for. Not the strongest of squads by a long chalk, but that's our policy at AFC, and in many ways I would support that approach. Our squad is extremely versatile, and may see us over the line. If the possible cracks appear, as many insist they will, then January gives us an outside chance of rectifying them. Here's hoping no polyfilla is required.

  28. AmericanGunnerFan

    Sep 10, 2013, 9:44 #39074

    I think that there are a couple of factors that need to be taken into consideration when assessing Arsenal's acquisitions this past transfer window. Perhaps the most important one that is being overlooked--but that has been mentioned by more than one player that Arsenal ostensibly targeted is the upcoming World Cup. Many world-class players know that it is important to not only get playing time if they want to make their country's WC squad, but that they get playing time in leagues and on clubs where they won't get hurt and will be seen by their national team's manager. As a result, unless they are virtually guaranteed to start for their national team already or have been guaranteed plenty of playing time by the manager of the club courting them, many have been reluctant to move or have preferred to move to smaller clubs. Of the top-level players who did move, nearly all either moved to situations where they would get more playing time or are virtually guaranteed to start for their national teams in the World Cup. This works against Arsenal for two reasons: 1.)Arsene Wenger isn't the type of manager to guarantee a spot in the starting XI to many, if any, players and there aren't that many players out there who can walk into Arsenal counting on getting a lot of playing time; and 2.)the English game and the Premier League is known to be a bit rougher and tougher than other leagues in Europe, as is the fact that other Premier League teams tend to "kick" Arsenal players a lot, and, quite frankly, Arsenal players have had more than their share of serious injuries. Every team has injuries and every player risks injury whenever he steps on the pitch, but look at how many of Arsenal's top players have missed significant playing time due to injury compared with players on other clubs, even in the Premier League. Why would a player who needs to play to solidify a spot on his national team's World Cup roster want to come to Arsenal, where he might get stuck on the bench or, if he does play, might end up getting hurt and not even making the World Cup? Where is a young German player like Draxler or a player like Luis Gustavo who may or may not start for Brazil more likely to get playing time? In Germany or at Arsenal? Where is a player like Higuain more likely to get through a season without getting hurt, in England or Italy? For the player it is a "no-brainer". After the 2014 World Cup it is a different story. Players and agents aren't going to talk about this a lot, but some players have mentioned the importance of getting playing time and it has been a factor for some of Arsenal's targets. One thing that has not been taken into consideration enough by Arsenal fans has been the lack of opportunities that the club can offer to many of the players that the club has been linked with. It's easy, for example, to say that we should have bought another centerback. As a fan, I agree. But, as someone who played a (different) sport at its highest level, if I were a decent centerback, why would I want to come to Arsenal? First of all, I know that I wouldn't get regular playing time because Mertesacker and Koscielny are going to start most matches. And, then, when Vermaelen--a former captain of the club--returns, I would be fourth choice at my position and hardly ever see the pitch in meaningful matches. If I'm a good enough player and I like to play, why would I want to put myself in that position? The only way that I would put myself in that position would be if I was getting paid a ton of money. Now, Man City and Chelsea (and to a somewhat lesser extent ManU) will pay a lot of money to top quality players to sit on their bench. Arsenal can't and won't. Moreover, as we have seen repeatedly now, it doesn't take very long for top quality players who are on high wages to get upset when they find themselves sitting on the bench match after match and it doesn't take long before some of them start to agitate in the lockerroom and in the press for more playing time or for a transfer. Take Ashley Williams as an example. He is a captain of his team and virtually guaranteed to play whenever he is able to do so. If he were to have come to Arsenal, how often would he realistically play now and after Vermaelen returns? Yes, he would have a better chance of winning silverware at Arsenal, but, were he to do so, he would do so virtually as a free-loader. How much would Arsenal have to pay him to keep him happy sitting on the bench waiting for something to happen to Mertesacker or Koscielny or Vermaelen when he returns? How much would Arsenal have to pay for him? Add those two sums together and ask yourself how much a fourth-choice centerback is worth. Would Williams really be worth that much on a two or three year deal at age 29? You do realize that Arsenal would not be able to sign him to a one year deal, so would he be worth that at age 31? And, why would you make that kind of commitment when Arsenal already has Bacary Sagna who can deputize as a centerback against many clubs on occasion? Which leads me to a critical factor that many Arsenal fans are overlooking: versatility. Yes, there are apparent holes in the Arsenal roster at centerback, fullback, DM, left wing and striker. But, to a certain extent, those holes are apparent and not necessarily as big as they appear now. As I mentioned, Sagna can slide from right back to CB with Jenkinson capable against most teams at right back until Vermaelen comes back. Was Vermaelen's form good enough prior to his injury? No. But he is a full international for a pretty good Belgian squad who has played well enough to be named Arsenal's captain going into last season. Besides which, Flamini can also play CB as well as both fullback positions. A lot of Arsenal fans have wanted the club to acquire a hard tackling DM who can dominate matches for many years now. Other than Yaya Toure, how many of them are there out there? Not many. And because of that, the tactics of the game have changed. Clubs have moved away from the 4-4-2 to more flexible alignments where passing skills and skill on the ball is more important than the size and willingness to make crunching tackles (which result in cards far more often than they did in the past). In these alignments, the midfielders rotate positions frequently--you no longer have that one DM who constantly sits in front of the back four most of the match. The back two midfielders in most current alignments have to be able to go box to box, be calm on the ball and make good passes very consistently. There just aren't that many big, strong midfielders who can deliver bone-jarring tackles who also have those skills. Look at Capoue, who was linked with Arsenal. He was thoroughly outplayed by Arsenal's midfield in the North London derby and ended up leaving on a stretcher. Flamini was an excellent acquisition because of his versatility. He will play in the midfield against certain clubs when a solid defender is needed. But he isn't going to be a first choice starter in most matches--especially once Arteta returns--because he's not as good in possession or as good a passer as Wilshere, Ramsey or Arteta. He's the fourth or maybe fifth choice (behind Diaby, if he ever gets healthy) player at those two positions. He will get some playing time there late in matches or as an injury-substitute, but, no matter how important the minutes might end up being, how many minutes will he get to play? Not that many, I suspect (although there will be some clubs he may get more time against). How do you convince a young player or even a good DM, like say Capoue, to come to Arsenal to play that little when a spot on a WC national roster may be at stake for him? Why spend the money that it would have taken to buy and pay a Capoue when he probably wouldn't play that much with Wilshere, Ramsey and Arteta ahead of him and a slew of talented midfielders looking to move up from the Academy (Zelalem and Gnabry look pretty certain to press for spots in the first team before long and there could be others)? Much the same thing applies up-front where right now Giroud appears to be the only option. Here again, though, the perceived weakness may not be as bad as it appears. While I agree that Sanogo doesn't seem to be strong enough to make an impact yet, people seem to forget that Theo Walcott desperately wants to play as a central striker and can. And, while Podolski's injury was bad, he is looking at returning in January. Also, even with Podolski and Oxlaide-Chamberlain on the shelf, Arsenal does have two young wingers in reserve who have shown some flashes of talent in Gnabry and Myaichi. Like Sanogo, Ryo may not have the strength yet to be a factor in the Premier League if called upon, but Gnabry is strong enough to deputize for Walcott if Theo has to move to the center of the pitch for a couple of matches. And, then there is Bendtner--who I'd rather not ever see in an Arsenal jersey again, but who isn't the worst striker in the world, even if he is far from the best. Bendtner has recently been put on notice by the Danish national team coach that he needs playing time if he is going to make the national team roster for the World Cup qualifiers, so, if he does see the pitch, he will be motivated to impress. Additionally, Ozil's arrival will allow Cazorla to move to the left wing and allow Wenger to use Rosicky pretty much anywhere along the front line except as the central striker. Ozil can also play on the wing, although he is much better playing behind the striker. Except for perhaps Giroud, all of the starters in these positions right now would be the first choice starters in any event. And, in the form he has been in, even Giroud would be chosen over all but a handful of central strikers at this point. While I would have liked to have seen Arsenal pick up Suarez or Higuain, I think Arsenal held out for Suarez because he was more proven in the Premier League. I also think Arsenal got some bad information from Suarez' camp about the clause in his contract that they believed was a true release clause but that wasn't. And, no doubt, if Arsenal hadn't been able to swing the deal for Ozil, the club would have ended up with egg on its face as a result. Bringing in a guy like Marica would certainly help soothe some Arsenal fans' nerves, but, unless Giroud is injured or the club is able to buy a top flight striker in January (which might prove very difficult for the reasons I have outlined above), I'm not sure that they will need to or should buy a striker in the January transfer window. Podolski will be returning in January, Sanogo will be stronger, and Akpom and Bendtner will be motivated to show what they can do. The versatility of this squad is such that Wenger can be very flexible in how he deploys his healthy players. The one problem that could arise if more players are lost for an extended period of time is one of fatigue at the end of the season because the numbers are at a minimum. That's where it will be crucial to stay healthy until Vermaelen, Arteta and Podolski return and to get those three players back at full health and get them in good form as quickly as possible. If Arsenal can do that, then this squad could have just enough depth--thanks to its versatility (which the acquisitions of Ozil and Flamini added to)--to make a run at winning a trophy or two this season.

  29. Bard

    Sep 10, 2013, 9:25 #39073

    Too many contradictions here. Yes Ozil is a fantastic signing but the lack of depth will be our undoing. He had the best part of 3 months to sort out the problems but true to form nothing was done till the last day. No centr back no striker for starters. Does anyone seriously believe we will win anything with this squad. I've posted before, Ozil was signed as a sop to the fans. His signing is to deflect the anger that's building up against Wenger.

  30. CanadaGooner

    Sep 10, 2013, 8:52 #39072

    Best article heading so far this year! "cherry without the cake" - absoluetly brilliant analogy. That is EXACTLY where we find ourselves this season. At the end of last season, as Wenger fought tooth and nail to finish 4th, his job was at stake (or perhaps, a riot at the emirates by angry arsenal fans) and prior to fortuitiously securing 4th place (mainly thanks to Stuttering-Spurs), he promised he will over-haul the team and fix the problems; immediately we finished 4th, the stories changed again, and Wenger/Gazidis were back to their old tricks with ZERO signings and NO strengthening of the goalkeeping situation nor defence. Flamini was their MASTERPLAN for the holding defensive role. But as always, Wenger/Gazidis have amanged to do just enough to lead us all down yet another hopeful season, till that week, when we will again find ourselves eliminated from the FA & Capital One Cup, 20 points behind Chelsea in the league (and in 6th place; but will finish 4th as Spurs and Liverpool will stutter yet again) and out of the champions league at the Q-finals. Some idiots on here will then tell us next season will be the season! Wenger will sort it all out next season. It's always a NEXT season....

  31. Don froth

    Sep 10, 2013, 8:36 #39070

    Bit over optimistic regarding the French lad we have signed up front. Bizarre bit of business, why loan the Campbell kid to Betis for another season and then bring in this French unknown quantity.....seems a waste of time. Still none of us could see Ozil coming.....apart from Mark Arber and that was a very welcome surprise.

  32. Frank

    Sep 10, 2013, 8:01 #39069

    At the start of the summer if you asked the fans what was required they would have said top class GK another CB a DM and another one or two quality strikers.We got Flamini as DM what a bargain that is.But in the other area's we still lacked quality.Dont get me wrong Ozil is the type of player you just cant turn down but so much is expected from him.If Giroud is injured or drys up(He has still to score a league goal outside London)we are in big trouble.I think you are very kind on Sanogo on the evidence so far.It will be very interesting to see the midfield line up in the next few weeks i think JW may have to spend a bit of time on the bench cant see Wenger leaving out the inform Rambo

  33. northbank123

    Sep 10, 2013, 7:55 #39068

    Find it a bit hypocritical that you claim it doesn't matter that we're already strong in his position, but then go on and say that Flamini could be our best business in years because we need strength in that position. A fantastic signing and one that nobody should be delighted with. But that doesn't mean we can't be annoyed by the lack of other signings. Giroud is not good enough to play that very difficult role (particularly compared to some of the other strikers in the league) and we're one injury away from a perma-crock kid who's never played more than 5 games on the bounce and has looked all at seas in his cameos being our first choice. Spout what you want about Viviano but Wenger made it clear he's come as cover, and his continued protection of Szczesny is a disgrace given his form over the last season and a half. We also desperately lack cover at CB. It was the calibre of signing the club needed but there is no way on Earth we're going to get near winning the CL with Szczesny in goal and Giroud playing as a lone striker every week. Wenger's damaging stubbornness in the market has yet again cost us - we'd have been better served by bringing in Higuain, Cesar and two reinforcements than signing Ozil, even though he is sheer class.

  34. Jumpers for Goalposts

    Sep 10, 2013, 7:25 #39066

    Ozil is a superb signing and just what fans have been craving. BUT - all of our main rivals have strengthened as well and everyone can see that Arsenal still lack strength in depth. Our problem over the last few years has been that our good / great first eleven are surrounded by overpaid dross. Until that changes we won't return to the silverware days .

  35. 1975

    Sep 10, 2013, 7:10 #39065

    Agree that ozil is a magnificent addition. Full of praise for the club for getting him. Agree totally with the rest of your article. Essentially giroud needs to stay fit, free from suspension and in form until christmas. Word of caution on ozil. We need to be careful about expecting too much. He may need a season to get used to the prem and life in England. Also with ga world cup next year may want to keep some fuel in the tank. Remember it took pires a season to get into the swing of things. Henry half a season.

  36. Gaz

    Sep 10, 2013, 6:42 #39064

    I get where you're coming from I really do. Been saying similar things regarding the importance of Özil's signing myself. Only thing I'd disagree with is your rather glowing reference on Sanogo. He's not ready and even if he is whenever I've seen him (5/6 times now) I've not really seen anything to suggest he's he's going to be anything other than average anyway.